Re: IPTV Solution

On 10/25/2024 4:32 PM, KARIM MEKKAOUI wrote: Dear NANOG community, My team is working on the development of an IPTV solution. Our main objective is to develop expertise internally on the subject that will allow us to develop our own solution. Any help, ideas recommendations on the following

Re: pgp keyservers

> On Jul 22, 2024, at 10:00, John Kristoff wrote: > > * https://keys.openpgp.org/ keys.openpgp.org is the only key server I’ve ever used, but I’m wondering if it’s one of the “hipster” key servers referred to earlier.

Re: ARIN email address (was cogent spamming directly from ARIN records?)

On 10/3/2023 3:48 PM, Christopher Morrow wrote: those are a bit of a false equivalence... but... ok. I think: "Oh look, more spam, delete" is basically how this sort of problem (email from randos trying to sell me ED pills or 10Gs) should be treated. I don't know that it's helpful to keep re-li

Re: maximum ipv4 bgp prefix length of /24 ?

On 9/29/2023 5:25 PM, Owen DeLong via NANOG wrote: Several people ate the cake. I received numerous positive comments on it and some of them are about the flavor of the cake. The question is did anyone from Cogent eat it? Did they have their cake and eat it too? OpenPGP_0x8E96B69A30C1

SMTP-friendly VPS provider where I can also get a BGP feed

Hey all, I apologize if this isn't the right place to post this; however, I thought maybe the NANOG community would be able to point me in the right direction. I'm looking for a place that I can host a mailer. My primary use case is a Mailman-style technical discussion list; much like NANOG

Spectrum/Charter business (cable) contact

I’m having zero luck getting an issue with Charter/Spectrum escalated and I’m hoping to find a sympathetic ear that can contact me off-list. Thanks, Daniel signature.asc Description: Message signed with OpenPGP

Re: A crazy idea

> On Jul 29, 2021, at 16:06, Joe Maimon wrote: > > > > t...@pelican.org wrote: >> On Monday, 19 July, 2021 14:04, "Stephen Satchell" said: >> >>> The allocation of IPv6 space with prefixes shorter than /64 is indeed a >>> consideration for bigger administrative domains like country >>> gov

Re: Anycast but for egress

> On Jul 27, 2021, at 17:20, Vimal wrote: > > Hi all, great replies. :) Let me clarify my initial question, and then > respond one by one: > > My intention is to run a web-crawling service on a public cloud. This service > is geographically distributed, and therefore will run in multiple reg

Re: Anycast but for egress

> On Jul 27, 2021, at 12:54, Vimal wrote: > > (Unsure if this is the right forum to ask this question, but here goes:) > > From what I understand, IP Anycast can be used to steer traffic into a server > that's close to the client. > > I am curious if anyone here has/encountered a setup wher

Re: Cogent emails

My reply to Cogent sales reps is usually something along the lines of "We have a corporate policy of only taking connections from providers that can give us a full Internet connection." They get defensive when I point out that they have large holes in their IPv6 routing table, but it usually gets

Re: Carriers

On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:47 PM Rod Beck wrote: > Does anyone know who are the providers in this building? US Signal is > there. Anyone else? > > 222 West Washington Ave, Madison. > Surely the landlord would have a list of carriers providing service into the property.

Re: Unsolicited LinkedIn requests

at 5:40 PM, John Levine wrote: In article you write: Agreed, and I do get unsolicited Linkedin requests quite often. Sometimes, this is clearly the result of someone scraping a list like NANOG in an effort to drum up new business/contacts. Those end up in the bitbucket. When you turn down

Re: Unsolicited LinkedIn requests

If you don’t want people contacting you on Linkedin then why do you have a link to your profile on your website? at 4:08 PM, Alfie Pates wrote: Hi folks, I'm not going to name-and-shame, but I just got a LinkedIn connection request completely out of the blue from somebody with the comment

Re: WIndows Updates Fail Via IPv6

at 4:29 AM, Mark Tinka wrote: Hi all. Anyone ever figured out why Windows updates fail when the computer has an IPv6 connection? Google has tickets and tickets of this to and outside of Microsoft since 2013, with no real solution or answer as to what the problem actually is. In essence

Re: Amazon network engineering contact? re: DDoS traffic

at 8:40 PM, Tom Beecher wrote: Nobody should ever be forced to peer to get someone to address abusive traffic originating from networks under their control. Especially considering the fact that Amazon is just a bit selective about their peers. Though, the size of our border probably ha

Re: Brocade SLX Internet Edge

I’m just going to echo what a few others have been saying. Brocade (now Extreme) have come a long way since the Foundry days; and the SLX isn’t based on the old Netiron code. The platform is a completely different animal. I’ve been a happy Brocade customer for a while now.

Re: It's been 20 years today (Oct 16, UTC). Hard to believe.

at 1:11 PM, Scott Weeks wrote: Wow, was it a table of folks new to network engineering? If so, then schooling; if not, then clue bat... :-) scott The one thing I remember about Postel, other than the fact that he had his fingers in a lot of DNS pies, is be liberal about what you accept,

Re: Whats going on at Cogent

at 11:34 AM, DaKnOb wrote: I guess people really don’t like Cogent judging by the fact that one unrelated email caused all this to happen again.. :-) Cogent have more pain points on average but they’re still the best option for getting to other Cogent customers. It’s not really hard to de

Re: Hulu / ESPN: Commercial IP Address

I had a customer with a similar issue. I statically assigned them a different IP and it didn’t resolve it. The problem turned out to be tied to their Hulu account. The customer is going to need to keep pressing the issue with Hulu’s technical support group. Make sure they’re not using

Re: new(ish) ipv6 transition tech status on CPE

Tom Ammon writes: > Are there any CPE vendors providing MAP-T features yet? I'm working on > rolling v6 to residential subscribers and am trying to > understand what the landscape looks like on the CPE side, for MAP-T > specifically. > > What about 464XLAT on a CPE - is that a thing? I know tha

Re: Massive Price Increase for X-conns at Telehouse Chelsea, NYC

at 4:26 PM, Phil Lavin wrote: $350/mo seems to be standard. Our DCs are at $250.Seems more like they held onto out of date pricing for a long time then realized it. For what it's worth, Telehouse London is around 30 USD/month for an x-connect within the same building. Our US datacentre

Re: Massive Price Increase for X-conns at Telehouse Chelsea, NYC

at 10:57 AM, Fredy Kuenzler wrote: Is anyone else affected by a massive price increase for x-conns by Telehouse Chelsea? When we moved in a few years ago they were asking 150$, it changed to 200$ and now we are asked to pay 260$. That's 73% more. I don't think inflation is that high in the Uni

Re: Multicast traffic % in enterprise network ?

On 8/8/2018 18:22:04, "Scott Weeks" wrote: --- j...@depaul.edu wrote: From: John Kristoff :: In my experience, real world IP multicast experience :: and expertise is almost non-existent. Major snippage, but these're my experiences, too. However, not in the .edu world. scott I've

Re: Feedback - SBC Vendors.

at 7:56 PM, Ryan Finnesey wrote: I am going to have to install a series of SBCs for a voice offering connected to Microsoft Teams. We are going to pass the SIP traffic off to a larger number of SIP providers. I would like to get some feedback from the group on SBC vendors. I have two

Re: optical circulator as a bidirectional one fiber solution

On 8/7/2018 15:46:03, "Baldur Norddahl" wrote: Hello There is a lack of bidirectional one fiber (BIDI) options for 40G and 100G optics. Usually BIDI is implemented using two CWDM wavelengths, one for tx and one for rx. However there is also a lack of CWDM and DWDM options for 40G and 100G.

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

at 8:56 PM, John Levine wrote: In article you write: I'm very sorry to read that, as an ISP, you have to comply with a para-judicial process that puts you in charge of censorship. Dealing with DMCA notices is a matter of statute law in the US, and it is a really, really bad idea to ignore t

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

On 8/5/2018 18:46:36, "Rich Kulawiec" wrote: On Sun, Aug 05, 2018 at 07:43:36PM +0000, Daniel Corbe wrote: This is a solvable problem. If they're sending unsolicited bulk email (aka "spam"), then they are, by definition, spammers. Block them and move on. If

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

On 8/5/2018 16:53:35, "John Levine" wrote: Seems to me that if you've registered your DMCA address in the Library of Congress database, and they send takedowns somewhere else, that's their problem, not not yours. If you haven't registered, you should. You can do the whole thing online in a

Re: Best practices on logical separation of abuse@ vs dmca@ role inboxes

On 8/4/2018 01:04:17, "Eric Kuhnke" wrote: If you were setting up something new from a clean sheet of paper design - do you consider it appropriate to have an abuse role inbox that's dedicated to actual network abuse issues (security problems, DDoS, IP hijacks, misbehavior of downstream cu

Re: unwise filtering policy on abuse mailboxes

Maybe he’s hoping there’s an off chance that someone from psychz.net is subscribed and listening. After all they run a network and this is an operational mailing list. at 10:54 PM, Mel Beckman wrote: Why are you telling us here on Nanog? -mel

Re: Comcast

at 1:57 PM, Steve Saner wrote: On 06/29/2018 12:53 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote: Can someone from Comcast contact me off list? Your customers can’t reach my network right now. Seems to be a known issue: https://tech.slashdot.org/story/18/06/29/1730238/comcast-and-xfinity-facing-a-nationwide

Comcast

Can someone from Comcast contact me off list? Your customers can’t reach my network right now.

Re: Tunable QSFP Optics

QSFPs generally output 4 lanes of traffic. Either 4 channels at 10G or 4 channels at 25G. So unless you find an optic that can do single-channel OTN at 100G, you’re probably going to have a hard time plugging them into a DWDM shelf. at 12:27 PM, Lewis,Mitchell T. wrote: Does anyone kno

Re: What are people using for IPAM these days?

+1 for Netbox. at 4:56 PM, Justin Seabrook-Rocha wrote: Netbox (https://github.com/digitalocean/netbox ) is our choice. Can be completely API driven, has a lot of DCIM type functionality as well. Justin Seabrook-Rocha -- Xenith || xen...@xenith.org

Re: Need /24 (arin) asap

at 12:11 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: Unfortunately, for an eyeball network, you don't have a good way of knowing that ahead of time without actually using it. Very true. We got lucky with our transfer block. A /21 from Dupont’s address space that was never even announced before. But

Re: ICANN GDPR lawsuit

at 2:40 PM, Baldur Norddahl wrote: man. 4. jun. 2018 17.31 skrev McBride, Mack : GDPR doesn't play well with directory listing services. BUT since providing contact information is exactly what a directory listing service does, It is safe to assume that this is 'essential' under GDPR. No it

Re: Email security: PGP/GPG & S/MIME vulnerability drop imminent

On 5/15/2018 05:59, Brian Kantor wrote: > > I imagine some fool told them this improves security, and they were > stupid enough to believe it. > - Brian > It's a bit simpler than that. Too many people are dazzled by polished presentations. It's a sad fact of life that there are way t

Re: The story about MyEtherWallet.com hijack or how to become a millionare in 2 hours.

Is MyEtherWallet really doing 500k/hr in business though? > On Apr 24, 2018, at 2:35 PM, Fredrik Korsbäck wrote: > > Aloha. > > Surprised this hasnt "made the news" over at this list yet. > > https://doublepulsar.com/hijack-of-amazons-internet-domain-service-used-to-reroute-web-traffic-for-two

Firewall as a Service.

Are there any vendors that have hardware firewalls and maintain their own Openstack nova/neutron driver set? I’m looking for something that I can offer to my VPS customers as a self-managed service. At the moment, I’m using the default firewall driver. Which is nothing but a wrapper for iptab

Re: Comcast / Level3 Peering Issues?

> On Mar 22, 2018, at 5:48 PM, David Deutsch wrote: > > Hey guys, > > VoIP provider here with primary connectivity through Level3 in LAX. > > For the past week+ we have seen dropped RTP packets between our Level3 > connection and Comcast fiber customers located in Denver and Detroit > > Initi

Re: Amazon Contact

> On Sep 8, 2016, at 1:54 PM, Shon Elliott wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > Sorry for having to ask this, but I haven't been able to chase down anyone > from Amazon. Can someone from Amazon who might be watching the list who deals > with the Amazon Instant Video, FireTV, Music, and other streaming

Re: IPv6 is better than ipv4

> On Jun 2, 2016, at 12:13 PM, Ca By wrote: > > On Thursday, June 2, 2016, Josh Luthman wrote: > >> Just a thought - ipv4 includes older more rural connections such as 1M DSL >> out in the sticks. That weighs the average connection time down. v6 being >> capable on modern 4G wireless and fib

NYC & Philly Metro rack stack and config

If anyone in the NYC and Philly metro areas want to make a few extra bucks, contact me off list. I need someone to drop an initial config on some brocade routers and run some cabling. Best, Daniel

Re: ARIN down?

> On Mar 26, 2016, at 12:43 AM, Mel Beckman wrote: > > I haven’t been able to connect to http://arin.net for several hours, but was > able to open a ticket this morning. I’ve tried from several different > networks, all roads seem to lead to the same place, with packets dropping at > the NTT

Re: Remote hands mailing lists?

You may also want to try some places where content providers and content creators gather like webhostingtalk because there’s often small operators and individuals there trying to get their names known who may appreciate picking up extra work. > On Feb 20, 2016, at 9:31 PM, Christopher Morrow

-48DC electrical supply

Where do you guys get your supplies (wire, connectors, tools) for -48VDC stuff?

as24748

Can anyone venture a guess as to what this might be about? http://irrexplorer.nlnog.net/search/AS24748:AS-THINX Why would my ASN be part of a foreign AS-SET? Is this something I need to worry about? My gut reaction is to reach out to ripe.

Re: Cable Operator List

at least 16X4 > > output. Something with the ability to upgrade to software upgrade to DOCSIS > > 3.1 would be nice, but I doubt that would be a low cost solution. > > > > Whats out there for small operators that don't want a large chassis based > > system t

Re: Cable Operator List

om/product-details.php?ID=miniCMTS200a which seems to > retail for under $5000. > > > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 7:48 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote: > > > On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Colton Conor wrote: > > > > Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated for cable/MSO

Re: Cable Operator List

> On Feb 2, 2016, at 8:42 AM, Colton Conor wrote: > > Are there any mailing lists out there dedicated for cable/MSO type > operators? > I'm curious about this too. I’m not a cable operator (in that I haven’t successfully registered for a cable franchise yet) but I do operate a docsis network

Re: Team Cymru BGP bogon status ???

> On Jan 31, 2016, at 11:44 AM, Matthew Huff wrote: > > Starting around 7:17 am EST, we lost our IPv4 & IPv6 BGP connections to > Cymru. We have two connections in both IPv4 and IPv6 on both of our two > routers. On each router one connection is stuck in active, the other > providing 0 prefix

Re: Peering Exchange

> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:22 PM, Daniel Corbe wrote: > > >> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor wrote: >> >> Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who >> is and is not on the route server? >> > > Publicly?

Re: Peering Exchange

> On Jan 26, 2016, at 3:09 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > > Is there a way to browse a route server at certain exchanges, and see who > is and is not on the route server? > Publicly? No. Best way is to peer with one and see what routes it’s giving you. Some exchanges (like Equinix) do publish

Re: RADb Outage?

How come? What situations would you run into that are so urgent about updating prefix lists that the task can’t be put off for a few hours? > On Jan 23, 2016, at 1:50 PM, Max Tulyev wrote: > > People do prefix filtering based on *DB may think twice... > > On 23.01.16 07:42, Larry J. Blunk wr

Re: Is it normal for your provider to withhold BGP peering info until the night of the cut?

> We have 4 full-peering providers between two data centers. Our accounting > people did some shopping and found that there was a competitor who came in > substantially lower this year and leadership decided to swap our most > expensive circuit to the new carrier. > (I don't know what etiquette

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:47 PM, Robert Glover wrote: > > On 1/21/2016 10:40 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote: >>> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman >>> wrote: >>> >>> Since Cogent is clearly the bad actor here (the burden being Cogent's

Re: The IPv6 Travesty that is Cogent's refusal to peer Hurricane Electric - and how to solve it

> On Jan 21, 2016, at 1:07 PM, Matthew D. Hardeman > wrote: > > Since Cogent is clearly the bad actor here (the burden being Cogent's to > prove otherwise because HE is publicly on record as saying that they’d love > to peer with Cogent), I’m giving serious consideration to dropping Cogent >

Re: Programmable SFP+ Transcievers

ric Litvin > Luma > > Sent from my iPhone > > On Jan 18, 2016, at 11:08 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote: > >>> On Jan 18, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Colton Conor wrote: >>> >>> What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers? >>>

Re: Programmable SFP+ Transcievers

> On Jan 18, 2016, at 2:02 PM, Colton Conor wrote: > > What options are out there for re-programmable SFP and SFP+ transceivers? > So far I have found both > https://www.flexoptix.net/en/flexbox-v3-transceiver-programmer.html and > http://solid-optics.com/tools/multi-fiber-tool/so-multi-fiber-too

CPE that supports 464XLAT

Anyone out there aware of any DOCSIS 3.0 cable modems that have a working CLAT implementation?

Re: Survey on Middlebox modeling and troubleshooting

> On Jan 6, 2016, at 7:51 PM, Zhang, Ying wrote: > > Dear All, > > We are researchers in HP Labs and Duke university. We are currently working > on a project related to Middlebox modeling and troubleshooting. > We are currently conducting a survey and gathering feedback from operators. > Can y

Re: de-peering for security sake

You know, without actually looking I’m willing to lay money down that the people beating the blocklist drum are the same people who scream the loudest about net neutrality when they can’t actually get to the content they want. > On Dec 25, 2015, at 11:25 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote: > &g

Re: de-peering for security sake

p://www.ics-il.com > > > > Midwest Internet Exchange > http://www.midwest-ix.com > > > - Original Message - > > From: "Daniel Corbe" > To: "Nick Hilliard" > Cc: "NANOG" > Sent: Friday, December 25, 2015 8:11

Re: de-peering for security sake

> On Dec 25, 2015, at 7:14 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > Daniel Corbe wrote: >> Let’s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of having >> a tangible mitigation plan in place. > > You mean, cut off Sweden, Ireland, Finland, Switzerland and Israel? >

Re: de-peering for security sake

Let’s just cut off the entirety of the third world instead of having a tangible mitigation plan in place. > On Dec 24, 2015, at 6:44 PM, Colin Johnston wrote: > > see > http://map.norsecorp.com > > We really need to ask if China and Russia for that matter will not take abuse > reports serious

Atlantic City

Can someone quote me a price off-list for 300Mbit (preferably on a GigE) in Atlantic City somewhere?

Re: Nat

> On Dec 20, 2015, at 1:22 PM, Matthew Petach wrote: > > On Sun, Dec 20, 2015 at 9:55 AM, Daniel Corbe wrote: >>> On Dec 20, 2015, at 11:57 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>> >>> There is little that can be done about much of this now, but at least we >>&

Re: Nat

least we can > label some of these past decisions as ridiculous and hopefully a lesson for > next time. There isn’t going to be a next time. > > > > > - > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > - Origina

Re: Nat

Hi, > On Dec 19, 2015, at 11:41 AM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > "A single /64 has never been enough and it is time to grind that > myth into the ground. ISP's that say a single /64 is enough are > clueless." > > > > OOL > > > A 100 gallon fuel tank is fine for most forms of tran

Re: Comcast carrier sales

> On Dec 16, 2015, at 8:37 PM, Mike wrote: > > Hi, > >Im trying to establish connectivity with comcast and their normal sales > channel doesn't seem to be equipped to deal with a facilities based carrier > who wishes to establish some kind of meet-me arrangement on fiber. Does > anyone k

Re: John McAfee: Massive DDoS attack on the internet was from smartphone botnet on popular app

> On Dec 12, 2015, at 1:18 AM, Jay Ashworth wrote: > > Is McAfee just talking to dry his teeth here? This isn't actually practical, > is it? Carriers would notice, right? Whether carriers might notice (or even care, because hey we can bill for data!) is debatable. But... > > http://www.ibt

Re: Ransom DDoS attack - need help!

> On Dec 3, 2015, at 10:26 AM, Nick Hilliard wrote: > > On 03/12/2015 08:15, halp us wrote: >> a very well known group that has been in the news lately. Recently they've >> threatened to carry out a major DDoS attack if they are not paid by a >> deadline which is approaching. They've performed a

Third Party NOC services

Can anyone recommend some good third parties for NOC services? I don’t necessarily need something on the scope of companies like iNOC where they charge 20 bucks a device because I’ve got my own monitoring system. What I need are bodies to watch my monitors and react to problems. I also need a

Re: route converge time

Baldur Norddahl writes: > Hi > > I added a default static route 0.0.0.0 to provider A on router A and did > the same to provider B on router B. This is supposed to be a trick that > allows the network to move packets before everything is fully converged. > Traffic might not leave the most optima

Re: New ISPs getting of the ground without IPv4?

nanog-...@mail.com writes: > Surprisingly enough demand for Internet services did not end when we > ran out of IPv4. I'd like to hear from the guys and gals starting new > ISPs how they are facing this brave new world. I can help. We're a cable company operating in Atlantic City who hope to hav

Re: configuration sanity check

"marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr" writes: > Hi Nanogers, > > Any recommendation about a software which check the live config of > cisco/juniper devices against some templates ? > > The goal is to have a template about different function device, like: > - CORE device must have this bloc and this clock >

Re: new message

Everyone else is getting them too. You can easily snag them with an appropriate procmail filter though: :0: * ^Subject:.*Fw: new message Maildir/.Junk/ -Daniel Matt Hoppes writes: > Am I the only one getting these messages repeatedly for the last day??? > >> On Oct 24, 2015, at 21:35, Ricky

Re: IGP choice

"marcel.durega...@yahoo.fr" writes: > Hi everyone, > > Anybody from Yahoo to share experience on IGP choice ? > IS-IS vs OSPF, why did you switch from one to the other, for what reason ? > Same question could apply to other ISP, I'd like to heard some > international ISP/carriers design choice,

Re: Current IPv4 Options

Chris Knipe writes: > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Clay Curtis wrote: > >> I work for a VAR and we are starting to have customers come to us to help >> with internet redundancy projects and they are unable to get address space >> from ARIN. What are the viable options here? I have read abo

Re: Huawei and ZTE Routers

Colton Conor writes: > The other thread about the Alcatel-Lucent routers has been pleasantly > delightful. Our organization used to believe that Juniper, Cisco, and > Brocade were the only true vendors for carrier grade routing, but now we > are going to throw Alcatel-Lucent into the mix. > > ZT

Re: Frontier: Blocking port 22 because of illegal files?

Nothing helps promote a free and open Internet more than micromanaging your users' download activity. Not really sure how someone comes to the conclusion that nobody really *needs* ssh for anything. "Livingood, Jason" writes: > ISPs are generally expected to disclose any port blocking. A qui

Re: Need recommendations for high-feature, high-density L3 Switch

Cliff Bowles writes: > We have some aging infrastructure and need to start budgeting next-gen. > > > * The network has several small routers as individual edges to peers, > WAN, SIP services. > > * It has a couple 6509s as Internet edge (full tables, 2 carriers, no > transit, s

Re: Cisco IOS stable/production safe versions?

Nick Ellermann writes: > I have a Cisco IOS specific question for the group and also > specifically related to the 6500 platform. We have always been very > conservative with our IOS version that we run in production, we are > still running a pretty old safe harbor build of 12.2.x on SUP 720 > 3

Re: Network ops lists.

Ryan Finnesey writes: > At one point I stumbled across a site that listed all of the network > ops lists for the corresponding regions but now I can't seem to find > it would anyone happen to have a similar list? > Are you referring to a list regional NOGs? Because there's other interesting con

Re: 1U or SS7 to SIP services in Sovereign House London

Just to save him some googling: https://puck.nether.net/mailman/listinfo/voiceops -Daniel Carlos Alcantar writes: > Voiceops list might be better suited for this request. > > > Carlos Alcantar > Race Communications / Race Team Member > 1325 Howard Ave. #604, Burlingame, CA. 94010 > Phone: +1 4

Re: Transit, Exchange Point Agreements, and Acceptable Use?

Paul Ferguson writes: > I'll apologize up front if this offends anyone's sensitivities as to > what is relevant for list conversation... but one sentence in this > Channel4 News story (from what I understand, Channel4 is a very > popular news source in the UK) struck me as perhaps in violation o

Re: Linux: concerns over systemd adoption and Debian's decision to switch

Andrew Sullivan writes: > On Wed, Oct 22, 2014 at 12:43:53PM -0400, C. Jon Larsen wrote: > >> Incorrect assumption. systemd is a massive security hole waiting to happen >> and it does not follow the unix philosophy of done 1 thing and do it >> well/correct. > > But I have no clue what one can do

Re: IPv6 Default Allocation - What size allocation are you giving out

Mark Andrews writes: > In message <54366ab9.3040...@gmail.com>, Paige Thompson writes: >> makes more sense to hand out /48s imho. theres only a mere 65k /48s per >> /32 (or something like that), though. > > A /32 is the minimum allocation to a ISP. If you have more customers > or will have more

Equinix Sales

Equinix Sales seem impossible to reach. Should I just give up and go through a sales agent or can someone from Equinix sales contact me off-list?

Re: upstream support for flowspec

Also, if I'm buying full line rate commit from you then you're not actually losing any money on the deal whether or not you route me the traffic. -Daniel Daniel Corbe writes: > Saku Ytti writes: > >> On (2014-09-18 13:53 -0400), Daniel Corbe wrote: >> >> Hi

Re: upstream support for flowspec

Saku Ytti writes: > On (2014-09-18 13:53 -0400), Daniel Corbe wrote: > > Hi Daniel, > >> This seems like it would be a godsend for small operators like >> myself who don't have >> access to unlimited bandwidth and are put off by off-site scrubbing >>

upstream support for flowspec

I was perusing RFC5575 after reading a presentation that ALU did (presumably during some previous NANOG conference). Reference: https://www.nanog.org/sites/default/files/wed.general.trafficdiversion.serodio.10.pdf This seems like it would be a godsend for small operators like myself who don't h

Re: old-school wiring nightmares

Christopher Morrow writes: > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 1:27 PM, John Kinsella wrote: >> Wiring closet rats nests have frequently been a fun topic, so with that in >> mind, may I present telephone lines in Stockholm, circa late 1800s: >> http://www.thisiscolossal.com/2014/09/telefontornet-stockholm/

Re: Gonodal GS4008

Gnodal doesn't seem to have a website anymore. They've apparently been bought by Cray (as in the supercomputer company). Can one even buy a gnodal switch anymore? -Daniel Faisal Imtiaz writes: > Anyone who is or has any hands on experience with the Gonadal GS4008 switch, > > Can you please

Re: Urgent

http://www.christianforums.com/t3057187/ -Original Message- From: ra...@psg.com Sent: Monday, August 18, 2014 1:00 PM To: nanog@nanog.org Subject: Urgent Contact for God, please reach out to me offlist. Regards, -AS666 NOC

Re: Cisco Switch Matrix

I can't think of anything like this off the top of my head but here's what I would do if I were in a pinch and trying to put configurations together: Find someone who sells (or resells) Cisco gear professionally. They'll help you identify equipment which is appropriate for your build. -Daniel

Re: Carrier Grade NAT

Colton Conor writes: > I searched carrier grade NAT in google, and A10 came up a lot. I thought they > just had good SEO going on, but it seems they have a good product as well! > Does A10 offer DHCP, DNS, and IPAM solutions as well? You really need all 4 to > handle carrier grade NAT on an acces

Re: Carrier Grade NAT

Colton Conor writes: > We are looking for recommendations for a carrier grade nat solution. Who is > the leaders in this space? How do carrier grade NAT platforms integrate > with DHCP and DNS solutions? How do you keep track of copyright violations > in a CGNAT solution if multiple customers are

Re: Richard Bennett, NANOG posting, and Integrity

I don't have much to add to this discussion, but... Richard Bennett writes: > I'm also not enthusiastic about relying on government programs > to upgrade infrastructure to fiber of some random spec, because the > entry of government into this market suppresses investments by > independent fiber

Re: Verizon Public Policy on Netflix

Ca By writes: > On Jul 22, 2014 7:04 AM, "Jared Mauch" wrote: >> >> Verizon wireless has other transits apart from 701. >> > > That's interesting that they have a different capacity management strategy > for the competitive wireless market than they have for their captive > landline customers.

  1   2   >