really wants to talk to you to get to you). How did our little
capitalist industry suddenly become a you must have permission to
contact me by any means no matter what industry?
jms
--
Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719
Senior Partner, Opus One Phone: +1 520 324 0494
On Sun, 21 Jul 2013, Kasper Adel wrote:
My vendor is giving me speeches on how they are improving their
product Serviceability, Usability and Manageability. They told me they
are adding a lot of new way of doing things, introducing more Unix-like
utilities and over all making CLI smarter by
On Sun, 14 Jul 2013, Aaron Wendel wrote:
We (ISPs) are all compelled to provide information from time to time under a
court order. The PRISM program is voluntary. These companies gave the NSA
access to their systems voluntarily. To me there is a big difference. I
would be interested to
On Fri, 12 Jul 2013, Tom Morris wrote:
We use Office 365 here at work, but I'd definitely be interested in looking
into alternate solutions --- at the very least I am going to be sure to
inform our staff that there is to be no expectation of privacy when using
your Office365 account. Gross.
On Wed, 3 Jul 2013, Jensen Tyler wrote:
My Google fu is failing. Can anybody point me to a script that will
create DNS entries from router snmp info?
I don't recall ever having seen anything like that as a pre-built package
or Perl module. If I understand what you're trying to do, that
Are there any SixXS admins who read this list? I seem to have committed a
faux pas with respect to requesting an account, and I'm not getting any
responses to my attempts (to i...@sixxs.net) to clear up the issue.
I appreciate the response, and apologize for this intrusion...
_KMP
We have a customer who was assigned some PI IPv4 space by Paetec back in
mid-90's and who has continued to announce the blocks, even though their
relationship with Paetec ended a long time ago.
Is this a common situation? Does the customer risk having that space
reclaimed by Paetec at some
May sound silly, but in another life I faced a similar problem and by
hosting local SpeedTest.net servers in our network we could fend off
many of these calls.
But I guess it will depend on your customers, whether they take it or not.
cheers,
~Carlos
On 6/20/13 9:45 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
Perhaps last-mile operators should
A) advertise each of their metropolitan regional systems as a separate AS
B) establish an interconnection point in each region where they will accept
traffic destined for their in-region customers without charging any fee
This leaves the operational model of
M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719
Senior Partner, Opus One Phone: +1 520 324 0494
j...@opus1.comhttp://www.opus1.com/jms
liters. Older systems of measuring security involving mass (pounds and
kilos) have been deprecated, and you should not be using them anymore in
serious evaluations, although some older CSOs will insist.
jms
--
Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719
Senior Partner, Opus One
On Tue, 11 Jun 2013, Vlad Grigorescu wrote:
We got hit with this in September. UDP/19 became our most busiest port
overnight. Most of the systems participating were printers. We dropped
it at the border, and had no complaints or ill effects.
Dropping the TCP and UDP small services like echo
On Sat, 8 Jun 2013, Doug Porter wrote:
We're actively investigating the v6 issues. We need more data
though. If you're experiencing problems, please email me a
tcpdump/pcap or any other debug data you think will help.
I'll see what I can grab. I've noticed the issue intermittently both at
On Thu, 6 Jun 2013, James Smith wrote:
Anyone know if Verizon/Alter.net is experiencing some issues? We're
seeing some big latency issues to one of our sites in the Pacific.
416-345-2609-gw.customer.alter.net (157.130.180.90) 420
msec *
12 ge3-4.hcap8-tor.bb.allstream.net (199.212.168.86)
On Thu, 30 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
http://www.cidr-report.org/cgi-bin/as-report?as=AS19262view=2.0
note the list of 'withdrawn' ... err, 19262 is no more? now it's
borged into the 701 confed?
Yay! Now if I can just get VZ to light up native v6 on my fios
connection... ;)
jms
On Fri, 31 May 2013, David Hubbard wrote:
Not holding my breath on that; been complaining to my VZ
rep for v6 on fios for two years now since we have it in
several remote locations and the most he could find for
me as of last month was:
Verizon's First Office Application (FOA) is planned for
.
As far as I can tell, this never occurred so we seem to
be a year late.
David
-Original Message-
From: Ryan Shea [mailto:ryans...@google.com]
Sent: Friday, May 31, 2013 8:55 AM
To: Justin M. Streiner
Cc: nanog list
Subject: Re: A bit of historical news
+1 to v6 on FiOS, I'd also add
Needs to be a Corporate CC though.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 12:01 PM, Tim M Edwards t...@lifelike.com wrote:
Needs to be a Corporate CC though.
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 11:49 AM, Majdi S. Abbas m...@latt.net wrote:
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 06:25:54PM +, Warren Bailey wrote:
We walked
On Fri, 31 May 2013, Patrick wrote:
On 2013-05-30 21:43, valdis.kletni...@vt.edu wrote:
May not be workable without a sufficiently high call rate 24/7. If you're a
small call center that usually has 3-4 calls per hour at 2AM, now long is too
long without a call, time to get suspicious?
either RIR just to update records, or is it
just painful manual process without having membership and website logins?
Off-list if specifics for the block in question are needed.
Thanks in advance.
--
---
James M Keller
On 5/23/2013 9:25 AM, James M Keller wrote:
All,
$DAYJOB has a legacy block assignment that was transferred to APNIC from
ARIN under the Early Registration transfer project back in 2003...
ARIN whois queried directly still shows the /16 block has ARIN contact
information, but walking
On Mon, 20 May 2013, Phil Fagan wrote:
Just curious and perhaps off topic a tad but; is the stateful filtering of
sessions on a router to replace a firewall? Or is there another reason to
do it? I could see a benefit of creating blacklists, however,
I'm struggling with what other benefits it
On Tue, 21 May 2013, Morgan Miskell wrote:
I realize this topic is semi off point so feel free to reply to the list
or to me personally. I am wondering if anyone has any experience using
the APC In-row cooling units in their data centers. I am specifically
looking at the ACRD501.
Do they
On Tue, 21 May 2013, Joe Abley wrote:
The last time we had to ship a number of (Dell, actually) boxes from
ICANN in LA we bought some flight cases that we could rack the servers
into. Our thought was to go for reusable, rather than one-off (and we
had doubts about the state of the boxes upon
On Sun, 19 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Sun, May 19, 2013 at 1:21 PM, vijay gill vg...@vijaygill.com wrote:
Resurrecting this thread. Anyone?
What software solution do people use for inventory management for things
like riser/conduit drawdown, fiber inventory, physical topology
On Mon, 20 May 2013, Christopher Morrow wrote:
I haven't looked lately to see what's out there, but I'd imagine there *has*
to be something.
I bet this is a market/cost thing... there are ~100 people who want
this? it's going to take a few million in SWE resources to build, and
probably
On Fri, 17 May 2013, Aaron C. de Bruyn wrote:
I recall a message a while back about a company that offered remote hands
nation-wide, but my Google-Fu is failing me.
I seem to recall discussion of someone running something like a remote
hands have/need blog/message board, but my Google-fu is
horrible ERP apps
(*ahem* Oracle eBusiness *cough* *cough* *cough*) work a lot better as
well, if you decide not to use Citrix.
jms
--
Joel M Snyder, 1404 East Lind Road, Tucson, AZ, 85719
Senior Partner, Opus One Phone: +1 520 324 0494
j...@opus1.comhttp://www.opus1.com/jms
On Mon, 29 Apr 2013, Derek Ivey wrote:
Thanks for all the hard work getting IPv6 deployed! I signed my company up
for the trials. Can't wait to test it out :).
I agree, I wish Verizon would wake up and announce something. It's pretty sad
that their IPv6 support page still says 3Q12 and
On Wed, 24 Apr 2013, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:
http://www22.verizon.com/Support/Residential/Internet/HighSpeed/General+Support/Top+Questions/QuestionsOne/ATLAS8742.htm
One minor typo in this one, that I've emailed Verizon's webmasters about
in the past.
A /56 does not give you 56 LANs...
time around - now with the interwebs!
--
---
James M Keller
Hello all,
I'm working with a Juniper partner in Colombia on a possible RPKI
deployment.
As far as I understand Juniper's website, only the T, M and MX lines
support RPKI, yet the partner insists that Junos 12.3 / 13.1 supports
RPKI on the SRX line.
I cannot find any document or reference
On Sat, 6 Apr 2013, Derek Ivey wrote:
It would be nice to get an update from them regarding their IPv6 plans. Their
IPv6 support page still says they will start deploying 3Q12 :(.
I've been trying to get some information from internal contacts, but so
far, no go.
jms
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013, Lorell Hathcock wrote:
I am having some speedtest results that are difficult to interpret.
Some of my customers have begun complaining that they are not getting the
proper speeds. They are using speedtest.net and/or speakeasy.net to test
the results.
Take the speedtest
The root cause of high scale directed amplification attacks is the failure
to assure the integrity of the source IP address. This failure leads to a
large set of directed amplification attack vectors.
BCP38 was written in 2000, coming up on its 13th anniversary. This root
cause, and various
Hello all,
I'm looking for a PoC in Symantec who could help me with an issue in
this report:
http://www.symantec.com/threatreport/topic.jsp?id=namaid=nam_malicious_activity_by_geo
I've already tried to contact the emails listed on the website, multiple
times, to no avail.
Contact me on
On Mar 5, 2013, at 9:55 AM, Mukom Akong T. mukom.ta...@gmail.com wrote:
[…]
b) To you who are managers, what else do you need your engineers to address
in order for you to be convinced?
How long will it take to complete the project?
1) You can use wireshark or other monitor to determine the IP address that your
video stream is originating from.
2) Upstream traceroutes to that address are probably not of that much interest.
The downstream path (carrying the video from the server to your house) can
follow a different
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, George Herbert wrote:
Our Visio guy's opinion concurred with mine; it's custom drawing, not
off-the-shelf capability, and would most likely have been in a
graphics program (though he thinks it might have been possible with
Visio, it would have been much easier in for
On Mon, 25 Feb 2013, Jean-Francois Mezei wrote:
Would it be the ONT ? (since beyond the ONT, the end user has no ability
to test the line).
I would tend to think the ONT is treated as the demarc point. Most
carriers I've seen treat them as the optical equivalent of copper NIDs or
I use a VBScript that just ALT Tabs to go from screen to screen.
-Original Message-
From: Livio Zanol Puppim [mailto:livio.zanol.pup...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 4:17 PM
To: Calin Chiorean
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: NOC display software
You can do this using
Perhaps the solution is to have a 400Gbit/s problem :-)
http://newswire.telecomramblings.com/2013/02/france-telecom-orange-and-alcatel-lucent-deploy-worlds-first-live-400-gbps-per-wavelength-optical-link/
On Wed, 6 Feb 2013, Ray Wong wrote:
My impression is mostly that people are left feeling uncomfortable by
a massive upgrade of this sort with so little communication about why
and so on. Emergency work for five hours and 30 minutes
disconnection that turns out to take longer than 30 minutes of
On Mon, 28 Jan 2013, Doug Barton wrote:
On 1/28/2013 7:27 AM, Eugeniu Patrascu wrote:
- configure IPv6 firewall rules (mostly a mirror of the IPv4 rulesets)
Hopefully that did not included filtering ICMPv6? :)
The level of IPv6 support in firewalls has been all over the place, even
from
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, Christopher Rogers wrote:
Does anyone have any sort of performance numbers for the jnpr MX10 series
running dual stack ipv4/ipv6? I'm specifically interested in how many BGP
prefixes it can handle in dual stacked mode. I've got an environment
currently taking 4 full ipv4
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
Comcast removed the no IPv6 excuse? That removal somehow skipped my
house in Washington DC where they installed (last October) a router
which does not even support it (an Arrus voice gateway- the one where
you can#39;t turn of the crummy 2.4g wireless
On Wed, 30 Jan 2013, David Barak wrote:
On Jan 30, 2013, at 7:52 PM, Mark Andrews ma...@isc.org wrote:
The update you sent is lovely, except I can tell you that the one (also
an Arris, running DOCSIS 3.0) which was installed in late October in my
house in Washington simply does not run v6
On Thu, 17 Jan 2013, Joe Loiacono wrote:
Tim Calvin tcal...@tlsn.net wrote on 01/16/2013 05:51:11 PM:
PowerEdge R610 -
2x Intel E5540, 2.53GHz Quad Core Processor
32GB RAM
2x 300gb 10k 2.5 SAS HDD
Since netflow processing is generally I/O bound, you may want to invest in
15K
On Wed, 16 Jan 2013, fredrik danerklint wrote:
From the article:
Faced with the shortage of IPv4 addresses and the failure of IPv6 to take
off, British ISP PlusNet is testing carrier-grade network address translation
CG-NAT, where potentially all the ISP's customers could be sharing one IP
Please, please someone go to http://meemsy.com/videos/add/24 and create
'Hitler reacts to the fraudulent Romanian ASNs'
After that we can move on.
:=)
~C.
On 1/16/13 2:01 PM, Matthew Petach wrote:
I'll bet Hitler would have used his real name on the whois entries.
There. Now I think we're
On Wed, 9 Jan 2013, Mikael Abrahamsson wrote:
I would like to post it here to solicit feedback on it. Feel free to use it
to tell your vendor account teams you want this if you feel it useful. I've
already sent it to one vendor.
Ethernet/Serial/USB management is useful, but I would not be in
Hello!
I'm looking for a contact in Akamai, preferably someone dwelling in the
dark realm of layer 3.
I've been contacted by a LACNIC member from Suriname who is having
reachability issues specifically with sites hosted in Akamai.
Thank you!
~Carlos
On Thu, 3 Jan 2013, Ram Mohan wrote:
I'm looking for a contact in Level3, regarding a client who is having
reachability issues with a few sites in the East coast of the US and Asia
(sites are reachable via Level3 on the West Coast).
Has the client contacted Level3's NOC? That would seem to
On Thu, 20 Dec 2012, Michael Thomas wrote:
I was looking at a Raspberry Pi board and was struck with how large the
ethernet
connector is in comparison to the board as a whole. It strikes me: ethernet
connectors haven't changed that I'm aware in pretty much 25 years. Every
other
cable has
Just for redundancy's sake: No, L3 is **not** the place for this kind of
information. L3 is supposed to be simple, easy to implement, fast to
switch. In Spanish we have a very strong adjective for this kind of
ideas: pésimo. I couldn't find a similar one in English without using
foul words :-)
In
On Tue, 20 Nov 2012, Miles Fidelman wrote:
Christopher Morrow wrote:
apologies, I forgot the emoticons after my last comment. i really did mean
it in jest... I don't think VZ has harnessed weather-changing-powers.
(yet).
Well, they ARE The Phone Company!
Makes me want to watch The
We have numbers to share.
We have performed two experiments at two different events LACNIC held
this year:
- June in Port-Au-Prince (~110 attendees)
- October in Montevideo (~400 attendees)
The question was: What is the relation between IPv4 and IPv6 traffic in
a fully dual-stacked network?.
Folks,
On Thursday, November 29, 2012 LACNIC will be performing a system
migration to a new release of the RPKI system. We will take the
opportunity to also perform a key rollover of LACNIC's RPKI trust
anchor. The new TAL (trust anchor locator) file can be downloaded from
[1]. Also a
Hello,
Due to popular demand ( :=)) ), we are currently offering the streaming
of the LACNIC / LACNOG event over an IP6-only channel.
Take a look at http://www2.lacnic.net/sp/eventos/lacnicxviii/stream6.html
The webpage will load over IPv4 but the video is IPv6-only
regards
~Carlos
On
On Mon, 29 Oct 2012, Pedersen, Sean wrote:
We're evaluating several tools at the moment, and one vendor wants to
dynamically scan our network to pick up hosts - SNMP, port-scans, WMI,
the works. I was curious if anyone had any particularly gruesome horror
stories of scanning tools run amok.
with...
Thanks,
Carlos M. Perez
Runcentral, LLC
On 10/23/2012 4:28 AM, Michiel Klaver wrote:
Carlos,
check the mail logs of your web-server, your domain might have a primary
A-record pointing to something different than MX-records. When the MX
servers do something like greylisting and bounce with a temp
Suresh,
The affected domains have never been on hotmail, etc. We've actually
held this domain/hosting for the past 14+ years on this particular
domain. Yes, there is an RFC violation, and it's apparently due to the
greylisting feature from the spam filtering.
Carlos M. Perez
Runcentral, LLC
...@.com
Action: failed
Status: 5.5.0
Diagnostic-Code: smtp;550 authentication required
===
Kindly contact me off-list.
Thanks,
--
Carlos M. Perez
Runcentral, LLC
Scan for devices with open port 80 as these are managed by a GUI.
-Original Message-
From: Jonathan Rogers [mailto:quantumf...@gmail.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 3:59 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Detection of Rogue Access Points
Gentlemen,
An issue has come up in my
Scan the local network from the local network.
From: Aaron C. de Bruyn [mailto:aa...@heyaaron.com]
Sent: Sunday, October 14, 2012 5:44 PM
To: Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D.
Cc: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Re: Detection of Rogue Access Points
On Sun, Oct 14, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Kenneth M. Chipps Ph.D
On 10/11/2012 5:08 PM, Jonathan Lassoff wrote:
On Thu, Oct 11, 2012 at 5:01 PM, shawn wilson ag4ve...@gmail.com wrote:
in the past, i've done many different things to create entropy -
encode videos, watch youtube, tcpdump -vvv /dev/null, compiled a
kernel. but, what is best? just whatever gets
Twillio.com
On Oct 9, 2012, at 12:36 PM, William Herrin b...@herrin.us wrote:
Hi Folks,
I'm looking for a way to do wireline access to send and receive
cellular phone short message service (SMS) messages. Despite all my
google-fu, I have had limited luck finding anyone that meets my needs,
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
is a threshold helpful here? (well, it's helpful to a point at least)
what if your neighbour starts deaggragating (or sending you their
internal deaggragates) in place of 50k real routes? no alarm, no
'change' from a numbers perspective, but
On Mon, 1 Oct 2012, Mark Keymer wrote:
I know in the past there have been talks about datacenter flooring. (Even
Carpet if I recall). What I am wondering is does the actual datacenter
flooring need to be like Static Dissipating. (Found something that does that
for about $10.00 a Sqr foot).
Note: this will be my one and only contribution to this thread.
While this thread has generated some very interesting and
thought-provoking discussions, I still think it strays pretty far from
being on-topic for NANOG. That being the case, let's all get back to
operating our respective
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Joe Maimon wrote:
Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a customer gig
circuit to them they would need a visio diagram (of what I dont know).
Has anybody else seen this brain damage?
I can understand wanting to diagram a complex design, so
On Fri, 28 Sep 2012, Gary E. Miller wrote:
Just got told by a Lightpath person that in order to do BGP on a
customer gig circuit to them they would need a visio diagram (of
what I dont know).
Network diagrams are required for PCI compliance.
I can understand (and fully support) the need for
On Tue, 25 Sep 2012, Olivier CALVANO wrote:
I am looking for an operator that can build a ADSL or SDSL in record time.
With a request this detailed, I wish you the best of luck.
jms
On Thu, 20 Sep 2012, TJ wrote:
My understanding, and experience (albeit with Android), is that all VZW LTE
is IPv6-capable.
I'd love to hear if Apple or VZW is at fault here, or if something weird is
happening ...
I don't know about Apple devices on VZW, but my Android phone definitely
has
Hi,
Hope you are all well. I work at an exchange point and was seeking any
assistance on how to implement a software based route server as currently we
are using a Cisco Router for that purpose. Any form of assistance will be
highly appreciated.
regards
Muga
On Sun, 16 Sep 2012, John T. Yocum wrote:
Wow... my brain hurts after reading that. The saddest part is, there are
folks with IPv6 allocations that simply refuse to implement dual stack.
Agreed. I'm dual-stacked at work, and things work just fine. The only
gripe I heard when dual-stack was
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Tom Taylor wrote:
Has anyone run into a situation where the MTU at one end of a link was
configured differently from the MTU at the other end? How did you catch it?
In general, do you see any need for a debugging tool to be standardized to
find such mismatches?
Some
On Fri, 31 Aug 2012, Andrew K. wrote:
Besides routing protocol convergence is there any service issues with running
mismatched MTU? Assuming the packet flow does not exceed the smallest MTU
value.
Not really, but given the bursty nature of IP traffic, that's a very
dubious assumption.
In
Free or costly? There is Opnet on the costly side, unless the old free academic
version will do this.
-Original Message-
From: Walter Keen [mailto:walter.k...@rainierconnect.net]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2012 1:38 PM
To: nanog@nanog.org
Subject: Optical network simulator
Does anyone
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Chu, Yi [NTK] wrote:
It is not about security. It is about finding enough bits to service 7
digits number of subs.
IPv6 takes care of that problem quite effectively :)
If there is a major amount of gear in the network that will not support
IPv6 (apply bat to vendor as
On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote:
They throw complaints from Resale CLECs in the trash. I'm starting to
think we should convert the line to VZ Direct, then have the customer
file PUC complaints, then convert it back when the issue is really
resolved. I suspect that is illegal though
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, George Herbert wrote:
Back when I was at Berkeley, we used to punish offenders by routing
their packets out to Finland and back (before Finland's net admins
figured out what we were doing and quite rightly complained).
Does anyone have a very lightly used, long long low
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
Labeling cables is mostly what I'm interested in. The el-cheapo
p-touch seems adequate to putting hostnames on machines.
Brother makes a P-touch that uses the TZ series label cartridges that
works reasonably well for cables. That, plus some
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote:
For a while we have had a customer with some lines which go down every time it
rains. We put in the trouble ticket, a couple of days later Verizon says the
issue is resolved...until the next time it rains.
The customer sent us some pictures today of
On Mon, 20 Aug 2012, Joel Esler wrote:
Can we all just agree that the whole pole needs to be restrung?
That's horrible!
Agreed, but Verizon and whoever happens to be on that pole are pretty
unlikely to do that unless pushed. The NY Public Service Commission
might find the state of what's
Lucky that any form of publicity works!
This lady
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/08/11/AR2005081102101.html
got her OSP cable issue printed in the Washington Post. And, as I recall the
follow-up article, even that did not result in a prompt repair of her
On Tue, 14 Aug 2012, Eric Wieling wrote:
Is there a speedtest.net-like site you like?
The problems can be:
1. Finding one that gives consistent results, as others have already
noted.
2. Finding one that is topologically close to you. Me testing from my
office in Pittsburgh, PA to a server
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Jimmy Hess wrote:
On 8/3/12, Patrick W. Gilmore patr...@ianai.net wrote:
it is the consistent and unequivocal policy of the United States to
promote a global Internet free from government control.
Now if they would only practice what they preach.
It will be
On Fri, 3 Aug 2012, Christopher Morrow wrote:
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 10:31 AM, Richard Miller rmil...@millerad.com wrote:
I am stumped.
Any ideas?
time to migrate to carriers that care about you and your business?
The tough part there is that Verizon is not required (as I understand it)
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012, David Reader wrote:
On Thu, 2 Aug 2012 10:33:38 +0200
Level 3 owns both 3356 and 3549.
They're simply preferring to have their customers pay them, rather than
a 3rd party.
I don't think it's suprising at all that they're doing it. If, as you
think, it's only happened
Better to use communities instead.
On Aug 2, 2012 11:34 AM, Fredy Kuenzler kuenz...@init7.net wrote:
From my observation Level3 has recently changed their routing policy. It
seems that 3356 always prefers customer prefixes of 3549, regardless of the
AS path length. Example (seen from 3356):
On Sun, 22 Jul 2012, ML wrote:
I was looking for information on any IX in Pittsburgh. Found PitX [1] ..info
is rather limited to say the least. Is there any information out there about
participants, size, etc?
I'm not 100% sure if PitX is still in operation. I know the guys who ran
it,
On Tue, 17 Jul 2012, Cameron Byrne wrote:
FYI http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r27324698-LTE-access-early-
Short-sighted and foolish. Shame on you, Sprint.
jms
hi,
Anyone out there who can help in setting up iBGP looking glass for an IXP. We
currently are running 2 route servers and and 2 switches, they all are Cisco
equipment. We also have a working web server running on FreeBSD 8.0. Any help
is highly appreciated.
regards,
Muga
Bush ra...@psg.com
To: Joseph M. Owino jpm...@tespok.co.ke
Cc: North American Network Operators' Group nanog@nanog.org
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2012 4:45:43 PM
Subject: Re: HELP IN SETTING UP iBGPlay
oh, and all the bgp looking glasses i have surveyed basically sucked.
they either brought in 42kg
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I was just looking around and say a major Indian provider Sify (AS9583) is
announcing /64s via BGP along with main /32 which is their allocation from
APNIC.
[snip]
Is it simply a misconfiguration or there is some use of announcing /64s
along with main
On Mon, 9 Jul 2012, Anurag Bhatia wrote:
I was just looking around and say a major Indian provider Sify (AS9583) is
announcing /64s via BGP along with main /32 which is their allocation from
APNIC.
inet6num: 2001:0E48::/32
I only see 2001:e48::/32 in my view of the v6 routing table. If
Church, VA 22042-3004
You would be surprised by some of the people I get off the street
applying for senior network engineering positions who couldn't connect
up a SOHO router and a dumb switch and make them work, let alone
understand how PMTU discovery works.
--
---
James M Keller
On Sat, 30 Jun 2012, jamie rishaw wrote:
you know what's happening even more?
..Amazon not learning their lesson.
I was not giving anyone a free pass or attempting to shrug off the outage.
I was just stating that there are many reasons why things break. I
haven't seen anything official on
On Fri, 29 Jun 2012, Mike Lyon wrote:
Whatever happened to UPSs and generators?
They can and do fail. See list archives for numerous reports and
examples :)
Generators are capable of not starting.
ATSs can get into a situation where they don't transfer loads properly, or
they can't start
301 - 400 of 768 matches
Mail list logo
