Re: mlc files formal complaint against me

2007-10-09 Thread Cat Okita
On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Joel Jaeggli wrote: I actually think the PC has done a pretty good job over the last 6 meetings. It's entirely possible that I have a strong cognitive bias due to my participation in it. However, that reminds me. We could use more nominees/volunteers for the PC, in the next 8

Re: meeting in the Dominican Republic

2007-02-26 Thread Cat Okita
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lucy Lynch wrote: I'd have a much easier time getting them to let me go to LA or SF, simply because they aren't pervceived as prime vacation destinations, beaches and all. No beaches in Santo Domingo (beaches in LA and SF, however) Are we thinking of the same place?

Re: meeting in the Dominican Republic

2007-02-26 Thread Cat Okita
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I didn't go to Toronto (among with some others I know), because 32F in NY is still better than 10F there. :) More like 1F. When the mercury climbed to 14F, my windshield washer fluid thawed (yay!). ... and the weather

Re: Throwing out the NANOG AUP

2007-02-19 Thread Cat Okita
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Gadi Evron wrote: On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote: I'm 100% OK with Gadi forwarding our personal correspondence and in fact encourage it (both my emails and his responses, please!) so that people can draw their own conclusions. Don't we both wish? What's

Re: Is there another NANOG somewhere?

2007-02-14 Thread Cat Okita
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote: NANOG-L is unique. There isn't anything else devoted to issues for truly large networks, and the providers that manage the distance between them. When I see Cisco (or Juniper, or Extreme) announcements about a vulnerability, those are useful. Nonsense