On Mon, 8 Oct 2007, Joel Jaeggli wrote:
I actually think the PC has done a pretty good job over the last 6
meetings. It's entirely possible that I have a strong cognitive bias due
to my participation in it. However, that reminds me. We could use more
nominees/volunteers for the PC, in the next 8
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Lucy Lynch wrote:
I'd have a much easier time getting them to let me go to LA or SF, simply
because they aren't pervceived as prime vacation destinations, beaches
and all.
No beaches in Santo Domingo (beaches in LA and SF, however)
Are we thinking of the same place?
On Mon, 26 Feb 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I didn't go to Toronto (among with some others I know), because 32F in NY
is still better than 10F there. :)
More like 1F. When the mercury climbed to 14F, my windshield washer
fluid thawed (yay!).
... and the weather
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Gadi Evron wrote:
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007, Robert E. Seastrom wrote:
I'm 100% OK with Gadi forwarding our personal correspondence and in
fact encourage it (both my emails and his responses, please!) so that
people can draw their own conclusions.
Don't we both wish? What's
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007, Etaoin Shrdlu wrote:
NANOG-L is unique. There isn't anything else devoted to issues for truly
large networks, and the providers that manage the distance between them. When
I see Cisco (or Juniper, or Extreme) announcements about a vulnerability,
those are useful. Nonsense
