On Wed, Oct 10, 2007 at 06:20:54AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anything that we
can do to see a productive community meeting, a thoughtful
election, and meetings with the SC, PC and MLC that lead to a
better NANOG.
Quite frankly, if you are one of the uninitiated, and that
On 9 Oct 2007, at 16:19, Joe Abley wrote:
On 9-Oct-2007, at 1053, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
i think the SC should review the idea of 2 meetings per year tho,
maybe that will bring focus and relevance. can i ask you to take
it to your next SC meeting?
I will not be on the SC after NANOG 41,
On Tue, Oct 09, 2007 at 04:42:42PM +0100, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
On 9 Oct 2007, at 16:19, Joe Abley wrote:
On 9-Oct-2007, at 1053, Stephen Wilcox wrote:
i think the SC should review the idea of 2 meetings per year tho, maybe
that will bring focus and relevance. can i ask you to
Joe Abley wrote:
No, there's a fixed overhead from having N x Merit FTEs doing NANOG
stuff year-round, housing NANOG servers, being covered by UMich
insurance, accounting, blah, blah. I'm not an accountant, as you can
probably tell, but I think that's the right high-level answer.
Just out
On 10/9/07, Sean Figgins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joe Abley wrote:
No, there's a fixed overhead from having N x Merit FTEs doing NANOG
stuff year-round, housing NANOG servers, being covered by UMich
insurance, accounting, blah, blah. I'm not an accountant, as you can
probably tell, but
William B. Norton wrote:
The big $$$ is to the hotel - $105K for 1 mtg.
This is just for the conference rooms? That's a lot more expensive that
I would have thought.
The bottom line, I think you need a few FTEs no matter how you manage NANOG.
No argument there. There will always be a
I've been involved with NANOG for over a year now. I have formed my
opinions on how well things work or don't work and will steal my own
thunder in this post.
I have already charged Betty to increase the value of NANOG to Merit. I
think she has taken some good steps in this direction. During
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Don
Welch, Merit Network
Sent: Tuesday, October 09, 2007 4:58 PM
Cc: nanog-futures@merit.edu
Subject: Re: 2 meetings / budgets [Re: mlc files formal
complaint against me]
I've been involved with NANOG for over a year now. I have formed my
opinions on how well things
Anything that we
can do to see a productive community meeting, a thoughtful
election, and meetings with the SC, PC and MLC that lead to a
better NANOG.
Quite frankly, if you are one of the uninitiated, and that includes the
managers that decide whether or not to fund someone's travel to a
