Having said that, providing its just the main plenary then
sure give it a go - why not try a 1/2 day in the next nanog
and then collect the feedback after to see how it went.
Essentially, this suggestion is just one form of a blended
solution to the issue, i.e. a blend of connectivity and
Alan Clegg wrote:
I understand why it's annoying... and it is disrespectful to the
speaker. Nothing like being the guy standing up there and 1/2 of the
audience not paying attention. I'd rather they not show up at all.
But there's nothing like being the guy (or gal) walking up to present,
Stephen Wilcox wrote:
Having said that, providing its just the main plenary then sure give
it a go - why not try a 1/2 day in the next nanog and then collect
the feedback after to see how it went.
Suggestion: if you're serious about considering this, announce your
intentions before
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 3:28 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Let this be a vote for *no* on shutting off net access.
It's not really an either/or situation. There are ways to
have both, and, as we both pointed out, there are good reasons
why speakers should not assume that room full of
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, vijay gill wrote:
In short, instead of coercive action, how about the presenters learn to be
more relevant, interesting, or fun.
I'll second that, and the whole pressure-release valve theory, Vijay,
and therefore (even if this isn't a vote) this is a no to shutting off
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, vijay gill wrote:
In short, instead of coercive action, how about the presenters learn to be
more relevant, interesting, or fun.
I'll second that [...]
If I were ever asked to present at NANOG and I
On 15 Jul 2008, at 16:45, Mike Hughes wrote:
People with their laptop open aren't the problem.
My 2[c|p]
I agree with Mike, many engineering staff are only permitted to attend
the meetings on the basis that operational emergencies can be covered
during conferences. Taking the conference
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Hughes wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jul 2008, vijay gill wrote:
In short, instead of coercive action, how about the presenters learn to
be
more relevant, interesting, or fun.
If what you say is worthwhile and engaging, they'll listen
again, what keeps the cows in the pasture is the quality of the grass
not the size of the fence.
randy, who has seen a bull walk through a fence without noticing it
___
Nanog-futures mailing
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 12:32 PM, vijay gill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 5:12 PM, Alan Clegg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AlanC {Dale Carnegie trained speaker, presenter, relevant, interesting
and fun guy that had thought about presenting at NANOG, but won't now}
I'm
10 matches
Mail list logo
