Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Martin Aliger
:-) Well. I think the separate assemblies are worth of discussion. For example, my recently proposed task (which could http/webdav post some file into remote server). If I could simply make some output (say NAnt.Contrib.NetTransfer.dll) and share it somewhere, anyone could download it. If we prov

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Jay Flowers
bleh? On 7/4/06, Shmarya Rubenstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > bleh > > > On 7/4/06, Jay Flowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > We could use ILMerge.exe to merge separate project outputs in the > > build process so that we get the best of both worlds. > > > > On 7/4/06, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Shmarya Rubenstein
blehOn 7/4/06, Jay Flowers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: We could use ILMerge.exe to merge separate project outputs in thebuild process so that we get the best of both worlds.On 7/4/06, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote:>>> Hi Shmarya,>> This is actually something that needs further discussi

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Jay Flowers
We could use ILMerge.exe to merge separate project outputs in the build process so that we get the best of both worlds. On 7/4/06, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Hi Shmarya, > > This is actually something that needs further discussion. Right now, > NAntContrib consists of a single

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Shmarya Rubenstein
Let's move the telnet discussion to the nant-contrib list then.On 7/4/06, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: Hi Shmarya,   This is actually something that needs further discussion.  Right now, NAntContrib consists of a single "extension" assembly (NAnt.Contrib.Tasks.dll).   This appro

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Gert Driesen
 Hi Shmarya,   This is actually something that needs further discussion.  Right now, NAntContrib consists of a single "extension" assembly (NAnt.Contrib.Tasks.dll).   This approach makes it easier for users to deploy and reference the NAntContrib extensions, but introduces issues when we want

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Shmarya Rubenstein
Hi Gert...If you want, I can fold the Telnet code into the Nant.Telnet assembly. This will get rid of the extra dependencyI can create a patch, do you want udiff?I'm very familiar with cvs. BTW: I am one of the developers on NUnit, and I'd also like to take a look at updating the NUnit task

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Gert Driesen
 Shmarya,   I did have a look at the task you submitted, but I was hesitant to add it to NAntContrib back then, as it does add another external dependency (telnet library). But for NAntContrib this is not really an issue, I guess.   Would you be willing to create a patch against NAntContrib

Re: [nant-dev] Nant contributions or where nant is going?

2006-07-04 Thread Shmarya Rubenstein
Suggestion:Why don't you give a list of open issues that are up for grabs and let people pick something to try?PS: I tried to submit a task to nant-contrib a while back (telnet task) and got zero response after a number of mails to the lists... On 7/3/06, Gert Driesen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -