Chris
>
> At 09:55 PM 3/19/2003 -0800, Brian Deacon wrote:
> >Good teamwork. 'tween you and Scott, I think I got my brain wrapped
> >around it. :)
> >
> >IIRC, the fix was a Brutal Hack(tm) by Scott, and the bug is still in
> >sharpziplib. Or did somebody hunt
Good teamwork. 'tween you and Scott, I think I got my brain wrapped
around it. :)
IIRC, the fix was a Brutal Hack(tm) by Scott, and the bug is still in
sharpziplib. Or did somebody hunt it down and kill it? Is this a
non-trivial sharpziplib bug? Anybody taken a peak? How many sentences
in a
Okee... so I'm fiddling with NAnt on Redhat Linux 8.0, with the 0.21 rpm
of mono. (Haven't yet upgraded to the 0.22 that came out this week.)
My not-so-impressive findings (I think mostly repeated from an e-mail
that may or may not have escaped my outbox):
Remove ScriptTask.cs from NAnt.core, an
Ooh. Could you post the shell script? I'd like to work on putting
something together to help folks get bootstrapped into NAnt from Linux.
(Hmmm... this might be a better long-term approach on both platforms.
Instead of including a previous set of NAnt binaries)
Some maybe-not-so-useful fin
Hmmm... I'm getting no joy with "mono-tools". Is it maybe on just one
of the mirror servers, or did I get stupid? (My understanding is that
anoncvs.go-mono.com is a load-balance to one of the three mirrors in the
US and Spain.)
And Philip... I'm curious as to the environment you got mono NAnt to
Just wanted to pipe up and say that I personally am really interested in
hearing any gotchas and resolutions in getting nant and mono to play
nice with each other. So thanks, Philip.
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Philip
Nelson
Sen
PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott Hernandez
Sent: Wednesday, February 26, 2003 11:01 AM
To: Brian Deacon
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Bug fix
for DirectoryScanner
Yeah, I had actually thought about
checking that each include resulted in some file being selected. But I think
your
My hunting around DirectoryScanner left me with a nervous tick about the
same issue... mostly because the code is a bit mungy trying to do both
things at the same time...
Ant does have the distinction 'tween DirSet and FileSet... and I'm
starting to see why...
Brian
-Original Message-
Fr
First… let me say that TortoiseCVS
just rules.
Anywho… I
decided to take Scott up on his challenge to monkey with fileset…
and in the process ran across a few bugs in DirectoryScanner. Absolute paths like
were being
treated like
and converting
to \my\base\dir\my\path
Also, my
Bravo! I'd love to see the code once you've got it dressed up for date
night. :)
Sounds like this also won't freak out trying to build an ASP.Net sln in
the absence of the web server?
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Matthew Mastra
Was I understanding correctly from an earlier e-mail that:
Would accomplish the same thing as this proposed patch?
My reasons for being -1 on this:
1) A user who previously intended his builds to fail because of the
absence o
Hernandez
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 9:47 AM
To: Brian Deacon
Cc:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt
tests, the csproj files and the sln files in CVS
Brian,
The VS.Net files are just there for
editing (and debugging). I try to keep them in
Recently got yet-another fresh checkout from CVS and ran
into a few problems… which then raises a few questions…
The root .build file successfully compiles everything, but the
unit tests don’t make it. Now
that I’m typing this, that behavior strikes me as even stranger, because
when bu
Done.
I noticed the index.html in /doc is slightly more up-to-date than what's
at nant.sf.net. I've attached a slightly more updated one which
mentions the wiki, and removes the reference to /nightlysnapshots (as I
understand the draco.net'd /builds is taking over that functionality?)
I think if
Strongly in favor of throwing 0.8 against the wall and seeing what
sticks.
Re: logging
What's folks feeling about moving "back" to the Ant-style loglevel
concept? (quiet, normal, verbose, warning, error). I'd traded some
mail with Scott about log4net, .config files, and other "wouldn't it be
be
there limits to this? (Like does this work
across assemblies?)
(Yah, I know I could see for myself, but I'm late for work.)
:)
Brian
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Bill
Conroy
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 8:15 PM
To: 'B
That will -definitely- keep it from working. NAnt uses reflection in
combination with the TaskAttribute to match your attributes up with your
properties and a privately scoped property not only won't show up in
reflection, but NAnt wouldn't be able to assign to it even if it did.
Hmmm... Is there
Awright, who released 0.8.0 without telling me? J
Brian
-Original Message-
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Rosemarie Leighton
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003
10:38 PM
To: NAnt Developers (E-mail)
Subject: [nant-dev] Slingshot task
Importanc
ss to use. Please someone inform me if this was a
bad call on my part.
Any questions, critiques, suggestions, or “hey go and
change this before we include it” are of course welcome.
Brian Deacon
p.s. – For my next trick, I saw that revamping the logging
infrastructure was on the todo
It definitely sounds like a job for the not-yet-existing (?) uptodate
task. In the interim, I shudder to suggest a frankenstein'd combination
of ant tasks doing the uptodate checks which then fire off separate nant
tasks via some kludgy use of the ant's exec command. It would require
yanking all
Has anyone else been experiencing problems with pserver access to cvs.sourceforge.net? I can’t seem to connect to 2401 and
traceroutes seem to be dying somewhere near sf’s firewalls.
And is this related to the nightly code drop still being from the 14th?
Brian Deacon
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Ian
MacLean
Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 7:39 PM
To: Scott Hernandez
Cc: Brian Deacon; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Trivial modifications to ConsoleRunner.cs
Scott Hernandez wrote:
>+1 on echo supporting
n. 'preciated.)
From: Ian MacLean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: Brian Deacon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] Trivial modifications to ConsoleRunner.cs
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 12:43:15 +1100
After seeing new Scott's latest changes it looks like th
of Elders feels it appropriate, I'd be happy to oblige.
:)
Oh, and I would appreciate being alerted to any style/convention violations
I may have committed.
Brian Deacon
_
MSN 8: advanced junk mail protection and
cing stuff around privately, or has this project slid to
the back burner? This is some nice code and a worthy project... 'twould be
a shame for it to die of neglect.
Brian Deacon
_
STOP MORE SPAM with the new MSN 8 and ge
25 matches
Mail list logo
