Hi Tomas,
Sorry I left the subject off somehow on my last post.
I have gone through all of your old posts in nant-developers. I was hoping to get a summary from you. I'd rather debate the issues then just "take over". I have an oppinion but I also know I might not be right. I don't want to just
I'm certainly not saying drop NUnit 2.0 support in favor of 2.1 support.
I'm still asking what those short commings in the runner where. I haven't seen anything on the nunit mailing list, at least not for quite some time. We can't fix it if you won't tell us what the issues are. I'm not getting
That will allow it to find the assemblies, but it still does not help tests that use relative paths in their code.
Could be I'm missing something.
Mike Two; Putting the tWo in Thoughrks
John Barstow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
02/24/2003 08:36 PM
To: "'[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
I'm going through the process of converting some nant scripts to use 0.8.1
and I'm running into problems with the new implementation.
It used to be that the task in nant set the working directory to
be that of the assembly under test just like NUnit itself. It no longer
does this. Also paths
A new version of NUnit is working its way toward beta. It has some features that people might want, but some of the interfaces have changed.
The NUnit2TestDomain won't work since the interface to RemoteTestRunner has changed. We probably have to shift back to using NUnits TestDomain.
I know I ha
