Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-11 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hi Dominik, On Thu, Mar 11, 2010 at 3:33 AM, Dominik Guder wrote: > Am 10.03.2010 05:45, schrieb Ryan Boggs: >> Hey guys, >> >> I've been poking around the internals of NAnt for the past few days >> trying to understand why it's been taking between 1600-1700 seconds to >> build on my Mono/Linux s

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-11 Thread Dominik Guder
Am 10.03.2010 05:45, schrieb Ryan Boggs: > Hey guys, > > I've been poking around the internals of NAnt for the past few days > trying to understand why it's been taking between 1600-1700 seconds to > build on my Mono/Linux system. Which is why I sent that small patch > last week. It wasn't to fix

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-10 Thread Ryan Boggs
shop to make .CHM -- which we > probably want to get away from as a dependency. > It can, but it can be turned off as an option. > Regards, > Charles > > --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > >> From: Leszek Ciesielski >> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt de

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-10 Thread Ryan Boggs
doc' task also create .CHM files? I know >> Doxygen also relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we >> probably want to get away from as a dependency. >> >> Regards, >> Charles >> >> --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: >>

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-10 Thread Leszek Ciesielski
egards, > Charles > > --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > >> From: Leszek Ciesielski >> Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc >> Discussion) >> To: "Ryan Boggs" , "Charles Chan" >> , nant-develo

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-10 Thread Charles Chan
es? I know Doxygen also relies on HTML Help Workshop to make .CHM -- which we probably want to get away from as a dependency. Regards, Charles --- On Wed, 3/10/10, Leszek Ciesielski wrote: > From: Leszek Ciesielski > Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc

Re: [nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-09 Thread Leszek Ciesielski
Last time I checked, DOxygen beat all other documentation generators hands down. It had the documentation ready in 1/10 of the time the other programs needed (for a code base larger than NAnt). It does, however, look distinctly "doxygenic", which may be a show-stopper for some people. On the other

[nant-dev] NAnt delay on Mono/Linux Update (Aka: NDoc Discussion)

2010-03-09 Thread Ryan Boggs
Hey guys, I've been poking around the internals of NAnt for the past few days trying to understand why it's been taking between 1600-1700 seconds to build on my Mono/Linux system. Which is why I sent that small patch last week. It wasn't to fix the problem but to allow others who are working on