Re: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant)

2003-06-29 Thread Gert Driesen
- Original Message - From: Ian MacLean [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Gert Driesen [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Miller, Kevin [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, June 29, 2003 4:10 AM Subject: Re: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant

RE: [NAntC-Dev] RE: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant)

2003-06-29 Thread Tomas Restrepo
Hi Ian, I'm not so sure. I see NAnt.optional as a place for new tasks that may or may not be useful. I guess this is what I don't like. Useful? Uhh... If someone wrote the damn thing, I'm sure *they* considered it useful. Who are we to decide what is useful and what not? But, if you guys

[nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant)

2003-06-28 Thread Ian MacLean
OK I bit the bullet on this today and copied all the NAntContrib tasks to a new NAnt.Optional directory under my nant source tree. I went thru and fixed all the issues Mike mentiond and then some. Nothing too difficult just lots of find and replace. It all compiles and the tasks load fine. I'm

RE: [nant-dev] NAntContrib update was ( Updating Nant-Contrib to latest Nant)

2003-06-28 Thread Tomas Restrepo
Ian, OK I bit the bullet on this today and copied all the NAntContrib tasks to a new NAnt.Optional directory under my nant source tree. I went thru and fixed all the issues Mike mentiond and then some. Nothing too difficult just lots of find and replace. It all compiles and the tasks