Hi Ian, << I'm not so sure. I see NAnt.optional as a place for new tasks that may or may not be useful. >> I guess this is what I don't like. Useful? Uhh... If someone wrote the damn thing, I'm sure *they* considered it useful. Who are we to decide what is "useful" and what not? But, if you guys decide we should be so bold as to take on that decision, then it becomes much easier: don't accept things that are *not useful* in the first place, and now you don't need NAnt.Optional again. If you were to say Nant.Experimental, well, that would convey a completely different meaning .... jejejeje
-- Tomas Restrepo [EMAIL PROTECTED] ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data Reports, E-commerce, Portals, and Forums are available now. Download today and enter to win an XBOX or Visual Studio .NET. http://aspnet.click-url.com/go/psa00100006ave/direct;at.asp_061203_01/01 _______________________________________________ nant-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/nant-developers
