>-Original Message-
>From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, December 9, 2005 09:06 AM
>To: 'Martin Aliger'
>Cc: ''Gert Driesen'', ''Gert Driesen'', ''! nant''
>Subject: Re: [nant-de
Martin Aliger wrote:
I don't think we need to make task compatibility a
goal here.
I was thinking same, but first I wanted to use msbuild, I found myself in
situation where is used today. Even that msbuild is quite general
system, we, nant users, will call it mainly to compile vs2005 so
Hi,
> I don't think we need to make task compatibility a
> goal here.
I was thinking same, but first I wanted to use msbuild, I found myself in
situation where is used today. Even that msbuild is quite general
system, we, nant users, will call it mainly to compile vs2005 solutions. So
I rethin
has stabilized ? This is our policy for all new
tasks.
Gert
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Martin Aliger
> Sent: dinsdag 6 december 2005 21:15
> To: 'Ian MacLean'; 'Gert Driesen'
>
Hello,
here is first attempt to implement task for MSBuild interation. To
be a little usable for us, NAnt users, I made it atleast little compatible
with task. So its not a simple wrapper around msbuild.exe. Mainly
it accept fileset of projects, which msbuild itself do not. Property names
are co
Thought I'd throw in my 2c as a heavy NAnt user.
Gert wrote:
> Do you think we should support VS.NET 2005 solutions/projects in
> the task ?
My thought is that the task should *only* handle Visual
Studio 2003 projects.
Why?
It seems to me that VS2003 and VS2005 are sufficiently different
but maybe initially going with a plain task could be
the way to go.
Ian
-Original Message-
From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2005 06:38 AM
To: 'Martin Aliger'
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], '! nant'
Subject: Re: [nant-dev] need VS 2005 so
Gert Driesen wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Martin Aliger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 5, 2005 02:19 PM
To: ''Gert Driesen'', ''Ian MacLean''
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], ''! nant''
Subject: RE: [nant-dev] nee
r them (such as , outputdir, ...). And if
> we cannot do this, then what's the benefit over using a
> task anyway ?
>
> What do you think ?
>
> Gert
>
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Ian MacLean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Monday, December 5,
05 06:38 AM
>To: 'Martin Aliger'
>Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], '! nant'
>Subject: Re: [nant-dev] need VS 2005 solution task support
>
>Martin Aliger wrote:
>
>>
>>Or, alternativelly, it should not be hard at all to write task
>>just as a wrapper aro
Martin Aliger wrote:
Or, alternativelly, it should not be hard at all to write task
just as a wrapper around msbuild.exe as ccnet do it. Something like
already do. Not bad idea. What others think about this? Maybe I'd not give
up mine hard-earned build scripts after all :-)
I think thats
--
> From: Gean Boegman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, December 02, 2005 10:33 AM
> To: Martin Aliger
> Subject: RE: [nant-dev] need VS 2005 solution task support
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> Mmm , that does not sound like good news indeed...
> Damn MS :-)
>
&
Gean,
I fear it is HUGE task.
VS2005 solutions are msbuild files. msbuild is competetive product to NAnt,
so its something like NAnt's .build file. Even that msbuild and nant have
alot common there are also big differences. I fear there is not such simple
conversion as xslt template between msbu
13 matches
Mail list logo
