Re: [neonixie-l] Alternatives to 74141's etc

2019-04-04 Thread gregebert
Board-layout with the HV5530 can be an issue, so I connect the tube-pins to the easiest route on the driver IC. That gives a clean board layout (zero feedthrus for tube signals) but scrambles-up the bits. Unscrambling them in RTL code or software is easy, though. -- You received this message

Re: [neonixie-l] Alternatives to 74141's etc

2019-04-04 Thread David Forbes
The 74141 has 55 volt transistors. You can use the SN75468 which has 100 volt transistors, for more voltage margin. It can be controlled by the 74HC595 shift register. The 44 pin chip does replace a lot of smaller parts, but I prefer to use many smaller parts, because the board layout is more sens

Re: [neonixie-l] Alternatives to 74141's etc

2019-04-04 Thread gregebert
+1 for the HV5530 I have a 14-tube clock with IN-18's driven by six HV5530's, and have had no issues other than some mild cathode poisoning (my fault) which is easily cured. I strongly recommend using a level-translator IC when controlling the HV5530 from 3.3/5.0 VDC controllers; others have ha

Re: [neonixie-l] Alternatives to 74141's etc

2019-04-04 Thread Kevin A.
I would say the HV5530 is the best all around driver nixie IC. It comes in a 44 lead quad flat pack or J lead plcc, the latter of which can be placed in a plastic socket that is thru-hole soldered onto the board. It is driven like a regular shift register (like the 74HC595). Shift in 32 bits, each

[neonixie-l] Alternatives to 74141's etc

2019-04-04 Thread Richard Scales
Hello everyone. Since becoming an addict about two years ago I have built many kits and have now started down the road of building my own clock - albeit a very simple one. My query centres around the use of 74141's (or the Russian version) as direct drivers for tubes. >From what I have tried so