Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-25 Thread Jan Rychter
On 23 lis 2011, at 21:27, chuck richards wrote: Indeed, *is* there any modern low-current bcd-to-decimal high voltage ic that provides a one-package 16 pin DIP solution to this requirement? Is there? Please let me know if there is. This is not exactly an answer to your question, but -- I

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread chuck richards
@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:03:23 -0800 Is this a clock that was already built and you have been modifying for lower current use? or is this a clock that you designed from the ground-up for low current

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread chuck richards
@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:03:23 -0800 Is this a clock that was already built and you have been modifying for lower current use? or is this a clock that you designed from the ground-up for low current

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread Adam Jacobs
suggest? Thanks again for all of your help! You guys are a great bunch! -Chuck Original Message From: a...@jacobs.us To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com Subject: RE: [POSSIBLE SPAM] Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 13:03:23 -0800

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread chuck richards
the simplest, one-package solution. Am I wrong here? Am I missing something? Chuck Original Message From: a...@jacobs.us To: chuc...@all2easy.net Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:39:07 -0800 Here's a link to a reply from David

RE: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread Tidak Ada
2011 22:25 To: neonixie-l@googlegroups.com Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions On 11/23/2011 2:16 PM, chuck richards wrote: Ahh, ok then...it appears that the answer to my previous question is that there is *not* any modern low current single-package 16-pin DIP equivalent

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread Adam Jacobs
, they remain the simplest, one-package solution. Am I wrong here? Am I missing something? Chuck Original Message From: a...@jacobs.us To: chuc...@all2easy.net Subject: Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 12:39:07 -0800 Here's a link to a reply

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread chuck richards
: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:24:49 -0700 On 11/23/2011 2:16 PM, chuck richards wrote: Ahh, ok then...it appears that the answer to my previous question is that there is *not* any modern low current single-package 16-pin DIP equivalent to the old 7441 or 74141

Re: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-23 Thread chuck richards
: [neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 14:24:49 -0700 On 11/23/2011 2:16 PM, chuck richards wrote: Ahh, ok then...it appears that the answer to my previous question is that there is *not* any modern low current single-package 16-pin DIP equivalent to the old 7441 or 74141

[neonixie-l] Yet more 7441, 74141 questions

2011-11-21 Thread chuck richards
In an effort to build a low-current nixie clock, I tried using all 74HC parts. That works great, but there are still the (6) 7441, or 74141 TTL drivers. How about this idea? When the clock is running on the backup battery with no line power, what if 5 volts Vcc were to be removed from the