Hi Chris,
this change is fine for me now and I think Arno addressed all of your
concerns. Is it OK for you if I push this to 9 and add you as one of
the reviewers?
Thank you and best regards,
Volker
On Wed, Jan 11, 2017 at 3:21 PM, Zeller, Arno wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> I have addressed your comm
Arno,
> On 16 Jan 2017, at 11:23, Zeller, Arno wrote:
>
> Hi Michael and Chris,
>
> I see that in with "RFR: 8172253 SetIfModifiedSince.java test fails with http
> return code 404" you fix a problem
> on macOS that does occur, because macOS is the only platform that sets a
> default proxy fr
Hi Chris, Michael,
as I consider this change final from my side and the jdk10 forest is open now,
I guess it is a good point to come back to this.
I personally would prefer if I could still submit it to jdk9, given that it is
automatically consolidated to jdk10 and the code base would remain th
On 2017-01-25 13:51, Chris Hegarty wrote:
On 24 Jan 2017, at 16:44, Erik Joelsson wrote:
Hello,
Build changes look good except for one thing. In Javadoc.gmk, the dependency on
$(BUILD_TOOLS_JDK) needs to be set for $$($1_INDEX_FILE) (on line 317), where
the actual recipes are created. Settin
Christoph,
I would prefer to not push these native code change to JDK 9 at this stage.
They look fine for JDK 10 though. Consider them both reviewed.
Thanks
Michael.
On 26/01/2017, 10:02, Langer, Christoph wrote:
Hi Chris, Michael,
as I consider this change final from my side and the jdk10 f
Hi Michael,
Thanks for reviewing. So I'll push them in jdk10.
Best regards
Christoph
From: Michael McMahon [mailto:michael.x.mcma...@oracle.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 26. Januar 2017 15:51
To: Langer, Christoph
Cc: Chris Hegarty ; net-dev@openjdk.java.net
Subject: Re: RFR(M): 8167457: Fixes for Ine