RE: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

Wow, these are names from the past; I find it hard to believe there is any legitimate need to support these going forward. Steve - who's ported to almost all of those platforms -Original Message- From: Eric S. Raymond [mailto:e...@thyrsus.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 25, 2018 8:25 PM To:

Re: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

Bart Van Assche : > Which of the following files under include/net-snmp/system do you think are > still relevant today? No changes other than trivial changes have been made > to these files in the past ten years: > > dynix.h irix.h osf5.h svr5.h ultrix.h LOL. I've seen this

Re: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

On 04/25/18 13:08, Robert Story wrote: IB> * clean up headers in /include/net-snmp/system/ which are a IB> mess and have import loops IB> IB> * #ifdef hell / too many supported configurations I'm a little nervous about these one, especially with folks that are new to the code base. And as far

Re: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

Robert Story : >And as far as supported configurations, we're > very big on backwards compatibility. I think you are spending more effort on this than field conditions justify. And there is a cost you probably have not audited. I learned my Unix

5.8 testing status

Just want to see where everyone is regarding 5.8 release. Other than what's listed in the 5.8pre2 announcement are there any other features that will go into 5.8? Other that the bugs I filed last week from running the test suite against master branch, are there any bugs that are part of 5.8?

Re: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 12:08 PM, Robert Story wrote: > On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:31:13 -0500 Ian wrote: > IB> This morning we (Keith, Ian) met with an assortment of the > IB> NET-SNMP developers / contributors (primarily Bart Van Assche) > IB> to discuss how we could best help the project. The

Re: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

On 04/25/2018 02:08 PM, Robert Story wrote: On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:31:13 -0500 Ian wrote: IB> * clean up headers in /include/net-snmp/system/ which are a IB> mess and have import loops IB> IB> * #ifdef hell / too many supported configurations I'm a little nervous about these one, especially

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

On 04/25/18 12:58, Robert Story wrote: On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:06:28 -0600 Bart wrote: BVA> One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that BVA> integration with continuous integration (CI) services like BVA> Travis and Appveyor is easy. Adding such support however BVA> requires to add

Re: Summary of meeting between NET-SNMP devs and ICEI

On Thu, 12 Apr 2018 10:31:13 -0500 Ian wrote: IB> This morning we (Keith, Ian) met with an assortment of the IB> NET-SNMP developers / contributors (primarily Bart Van Assche) IB> to discuss how we could best help the project. The meeting went IB> well, at least form our perspective. I'm sorry I

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

On Wed, 25 Apr 2018 09:06:28 -0600 Bart wrote: BVA> One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that BVA> integration with continuous integration (CI) services like BVA> Travis and Appveyor is easy. Adding such support however BVA> requires to add proper configuration files and the

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/25/18 11:54, Keith Mendoza wrote: > > Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github to connect it > > to Travis and Appveyor? > > Hello Keith, > > If you are looking for a Net-SNMP repository on github, please

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

On 04/25/18 11:54, Keith Mendoza wrote: Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github to connect it to Travis and Appveyor? Hello Keith, If you are looking for a Net-SNMP repository on github, please use https://github.com/net-snmp/net-snmp. I hope Wes will connect that

Re: Verify AES support when Blumenthal draft is enabled

Bart, On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 9:28 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 04/25/18 10:04, Keith Mendoza wrote: > > Net-SNMP dev team, > > I have submitted a merge request to verify that when the > > --enable-blumenthal-aes is used in configure that it checks that OpenSSL's > > aes.h and evp.h are

Re: [PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

Bart, Out of curiosity, do you have a "fork" of Net-SNMP on github to connect it to Travis and Appveyor? On Wed, Apr 25, 2018, at 8:06 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote: > Hello, > > One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that integration > with continuous integration (CI) services like

Re: Verify AES support when Blumenthal draft is enabled

On 04/25/18 10:04, Keith Mendoza wrote: Net-SNMP dev team, I have submitted a merge request to verify that when the --enable-blumenthal-aes is used in configure that it checks that OpenSSL's aes.h and evp.h are available. Merge request is at

Verify AES support when Blumenthal draft is enabled

Net-SNMP dev team, I have submitted a merge request to verify that when the --enable-blumenthal-aes is used in configure that it checks that OpenSSL's aes.h and evp.h are available. Merge request is at https://sourceforge.net/p/net-snmp/code/merge-requests/14/. This should fully resolve the

[PATCH RFC] Add Travis and Appveyor CI support

Hello, One of the advantages of github over SourceForge is that integration with continuous integration (CI) services like Travis and Appveyor is easy. Adding such support however requires to add proper configuration files and the necessary scripts in the source tree. Hence this patch. As