Two Windows binaries for 5.2.2.pre1 have been added to the download
page. One is a regular binary and the other is linked to OpenSSL 0.9.8
which will enable the privacy / encryption options for SNMP v3.
A 'Development files' option has been added to the installer which will
install the header
shahram amini-didani wrote:
I have installed the binaries
net-snmp-5.1.3-1.win32.exe
and want to send v3 authPriv getnext to my agent.
I am getting USM support not enabled error.
Is there a way to enable encryption in binary
install,
or I have to compile the source with open SSL?
C:\>snmpge
Any more info on this?
From: Chris Florio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: make errors on OS X Tiger 10.4.2 for 5.2.1.2
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 08:06:05 -0400
To: Rob Kudyba <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
--Apple-Mail-25--820805927
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset=U
Title: Re: ipAddrTable AIX doesn't have one?
The last sentence should have said “Also if I snmpwalk this host I see no stats related to ipAddrTable or IPIndex, etc... I do see loads of other information however (so it is not that it is different it simply is not there).”
Alton
On 9/23/05 11:
On Mon, 2005-09-26 at 11:45 +0800, Earnest Pan wrote:
> Error opening specified endpoint "udp:161"
> Server Exiting with code 1
^^
If the master agent isn't running, that would
explain why the subagent can't connect to it!
It looks suspiciously as if you already have another
(non-Ag
On Thu, 2005-09-22 at 21:17 +0800, Lee Melvin wrote:
> timeout WILL exponentially backoff in the future release of net-snmp?
No.
Things changed the other way.
The backoff code was removed in 1998
(see revision 1.53 of snmp_api.c)
> why the comments in snmp_api.h ?
Because that reflects the ear
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 10:45 -0400, xuemei wrote:
> 1.What is the most recent stable release of the net-snmp version?
The most recent release is 5.2.1.2
Other sensible alternatives would be 5.1.3.1 or 5.0.10.2
5.0.1 is a *very* old and unreliable version.
Almost any upgrade would be an improvement
On Fri, 2005-09-23 at 10:59 -0400, Robert Story wrote:
> Looking at the code, it looks like it will run
> every 5 minutes from the last time it was run. Thus,
> each time the agent is busy when the timer expires,
> it will drift a little.
I've been thinking about this.
What would be the disad
