On Mon, 2009-01-12 at 11:05 -0500, Larry Brown wrote:
> In the description of some of the enhancements from v1 to v2 it lists
> the ability to include "bit strings". Does this mean that a value held
> under a particular OID could be a binary blob so that an actual file
>
In the description of some of the enhancements from v1 to v2 it lists
the ability to include "bit strings". Does this mean that a value held
under a particular OID could be a binary blob so that an actual file
could be transferred using SNMP? Not that I necessarily want to do
this, but is that wh
On Fri, 2009-01-09 at 08:37 +, Dave Shield wrote:
>
>
> >> > What I expected was some way of describing to the snmpd agent where to
> >> > get the value to return.
>
> That tends to be hard-coded into the agent (or subagent) binary.
This is what I deduced but couldn't find a description th
On Thu, 2009-01-08 at 12:31 -0800, Mike Ayers wrote:
> > From: Larry Brown [mailto:larry.br...@dimensionnetworks.com]
> > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2009 11:26 AM
>
> > Hello all, I've read a number of articles around on snmp and have a
> > fundamental theory
Hello all, I've read a number of articles around on snmp and have a
fundamental theory going as to how this works at a macro level but need
some confirmation. Any assistance will be greatly appreciated.
As I understand it the part of the OID that is returned depends on its
existence in the MIB.
