Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String

2005-12-13 Thread Dave Shield
On Tue, 2005-12-06 at 11:35 +0100, Gemma Sanchez wrote: > I have defined all my display strings with a maximum length of 1492 > bytes and it works ok. Now, after reading rfc 1157 I am very confused > because I wonder how could a data of 1492 bytes fit in a message of > 484 bytes. You are quite co

Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String

2005-12-06 Thread Gemma Sanchez
HELLO !!! I have read in rfc 1157: "Communication among protocol entities is accomplished by the exchange of messages, each of which is entirely and independently represented within a single UDP datagram using the basic encoding rules of ASN.1. A message consists of a version identifier, an SNMP c

Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String (3)

2005-04-11 Thread Robert Story
On Fri, 8 Apr 2005 21:19:58 +0200 Gemma wrote: GS> OK, now a new doubt has aroused in me, this is: the resending is GS> automaticly made by the agent or should I programme the agent to do it? The agent will automatically retry, based on the timeout/retry parameters of the associated session. --

MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String (3)

2005-04-08 Thread Gemma Sánchez
utomaticly made by the agent or should I programme the agent to do it? Thanks again. Gemma - Original Message - From: "Robert Story" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Gemma Sánchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Thursday, April 07, 2005 7:47 PM Subject: Re: MAXIMUN SI

Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String (2)

2005-04-07 Thread Robert Story
On Thu, 7 Apr 2005 10:42:57 +0200 Gemma wrote: GS> I need to send these display strings (that I am going to define of 1492 B, GS> like you have advised me) by a TRAP. Could a TRAP PDU carry several of GS> these Display Strings or it would be to much information? A UDP PDU can be 64 kB, but that

Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String (2)

2005-04-07 Thread Dave Shield
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 09:42, Gemma Sánchez wrote: > Another thing I need to know is if net-snmp is ruled by > the RFCs on the ASN/BER encoding, with no variation at all. Yes, of course. That's the whole point of Internet Standards. How could we interwork with other network management tools if we

MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String (2)

2005-04-07 Thread Gemma Sánchez
: "Gemma Sanchez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 8:39 PM Subject: Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:50:50 +0200 Gemma wrote: GS> - I have read in the book "SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3 and RMON 1 and 2" that the GS> theoret

Re: MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String

2005-04-02 Thread Robert Story
On Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:50:50 +0200 Gemma wrote: GS> - I have read in the book "SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3 and RMON 1 and 2" that the GS> theoretical maximum size of a OCTECT STRING is 64 KB. I need to know GS> if this limit is kept by net-snmp or if it imposes another one. It is the size limit of a UD

MAXIMUN SIZE of a Display String

2005-03-28 Thread Gemma Sanchez
Hi all I have several questions now. These are: - I have read in the book "SNMP, SNMPv2, SNMPv3 and RMON 1 and 2" that the theoretical maximum size of a OCTECT STRING is 64 KB. I need to know if this limit is kept by net-snmp or if it imposes another one. Another question about this matte