On Wed, 20 Jul 2005 11:01:35 -0400 (EDT) Phil wrote:
PB> > Is serverProcessName declared as an IMPLICIT index?
PB>
PB> Ahh... We're getting somewhere! A question I don't understand!
PB>
PB> I didn't find anything googling for IMPLICIT indices, but when I
PB> stumbled across IMPLIED in section 7
On Tue, 19 Jul 2005 10:46:52 -0400, Robert Story <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is serverProcessName declared as an IMPLICIT index? I'm guessing not, which
> means that you need a length for the string in your OID, which you currently
> don't have.
Ahh... We're getting somewhere! A question I don'
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 14:53:30 -0400 (EDT) Phil wrote:
PB> XXX-MIB::serverProcessName.105.118.114 = STRING: ivr
PB>
PB>+--serverProcessEntry(1)
PB> | Index: serverProcessName
PB> |
PB> +-- -R-- StringserverProcessName(1)
PB> |Textual Convention: DisplayString
Same results with 5.0.6 and 5.2:
phil-budne% /usr/local/bin/snmpbulkwalk -V
NET-SNMP version: 5.2
phil-budne% /usr/local/bin/snmpbulkwalk -v2c -c public searspoint
serverProcessName
XXX-MIB::serverProcessName.98.98.109.117.120 = STRING: bbmux
XXX-MIB::serverProcessName.100.98.106.111.117.114.110.
On Fri, 1 Jul 2005 16:16:15 -0400 (EDT) Phil wrote:
PB> Yes, I seem to have the MIB loaded (currently using a "mib" line
PB> in /etc/snmp.conf):
PB>
PB> phil-budne% /usr/bin/snmpbulkwalk -c public -v2c dev16.dev activeUserTable
PB> XXXMONITOR::activeUserUsername.112.104.105.108.46.98.117.100.110.1
Yes, I seem to have the MIB loaded (currently using a "mib" line
in /etc/snmp.conf):
phil-budne% /usr/bin/snmptranslate -Tp XXXMONITOR::activeUserTable
+--activeUserTable(1)
|
+--activeUserEntry(1)
| Index: activeUserUsername
|
+-- -R-- StringactiveUserUsername(1)
> On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 20:33:34 -0400 (EDT), Phil Budne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> said:
Phil> Is there a place that details the hoops I have to jump thru to qualify
Phil> for stringified display? I've tried size limits, and even tried using
Phil> SnmpAdminString, since that's what (the -Ob ex
I'm trying to define some string indexed tables, but snmp(bulk)walk
and friends won't display the OIDs as strings.
Is there a place that details the hoops I have to jump thru to qualify
for stringified display? I've tried size limits, and even tried using
SnmpAdminString, since that's what (the -
