Hi Marc
Thanks for the response -
Ele would have been around in Newcastle, when some of the performances were
streamed in the 2000s… we were all part of the same, sort of, community between
2001 and 2005. Besides Ncl.ac.uk , there was also what has now been re-labeled
D6: Culture.
My persona
Hi
Michelle Hirschorn Smith curated a lot of Monica Ross’s pieces in Newcastle. It
might be worth speaking to her about videos.
Best wishes
Helen
Sent from my iPhone
> On 14 Jul 2021, at 13:21, Jorn Ebner wrote:
>
> Hi Marc
>
> Thanks for the response -
>
> Ele would have been around i
require it to have a
body! 🙂
https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_cid=362710ae88&mc_eid=df8a5187d9
I have been interested in the book GEB by Hofstadter for some time, and have
been researching how it was referenced (specifically
alogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it
> to have a body! 🙂
>
>
> https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_cid=362710ae88&mc_eid=df8a5187d9
>
> I have been interested in the book *GEB *by Hofstadter
ly it concludes that in order for AI to be human-like it will
>> need to understand analogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it
>> to have a body! 🙂
>>
>>
>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_c
tingly it concludes that in order for AI to be human-like it will
>>> need to understand analogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it
>>> to have a body! 🙂
>>>
>>>
>>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-an
;
>>> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi all,
>>>>
>>>> I know virtually nothing about AI, beyond what the letters stand for,
>>>> but noticed this new article in Quanta Magazine. Does it pertain
>>>
>>>> -- Paul
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021, 1:38 PM Max Herman via NetBehaviour <
>>>> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>&
1, 1:38 PM Max Herman via NetBehaviour
mailto:netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org>>
wrote:
Hi all,
I know virtually nothing about AI, beyond what the letters stand for, but
noticed this new article in Quanta Magazine. Does it pertain at all?
Interestingly it concludes that in order for A
late 1980s argued the AI
> based on the construction of a "knowledge base" was bound to fail. He made
> the case that a robot adapting to an environment was far more likely to
> achieve intelligence of the sort that humans demonstrate precisely because
> it was embodied. Som
Paul Hertz
>> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 14, 2021 2:36 PM
>> *To:* NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity <
>> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org>
>> *Cc:* Max Herman
>> *Subject:* Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry
>>
>> There'
>>> able to do everything human intelligence can do might we not have to call
>>> such an entity a natural form of intelligence? Confusinger and
>>> confusinger. Norbert Wiener declared a distinction between human and
>>> machine intelligence though and I think that
12 matches
Mail list logo