Re: [NetBehaviour] Monica Ross

Hi Marc Thanks for the response - Ele would have been around in Newcastle, when some of the performances were streamed in the 2000s… we were all part of the same, sort of, community between 2001 and 2005. Besides Ncl.ac.uk , there was also what has now been re-labeled D6: Culture. My persona

Re: [NetBehaviour] Monica Ross

Hi Michelle Hirschorn Smith curated a lot of Monica Ross’s pieces in Newcastle. It might be worth speaking to her about videos. Best wishes Helen Sent from my iPhone > On 14 Jul 2021, at 13:21, Jorn Ebner wrote: > > Hi Marc > > Thanks for the response - > > Ele would have been around i

[NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

require it to have a body! 🙂 https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_cid=362710ae88&mc_eid=df8a5187d9 I have been interested in the book GEB by Hofstadter for some time, and have been researching how it was referenced (specifically

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

alogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it > to have a body! 🙂 > > > https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_cid=362710ae88&mc_eid=df8a5187d9 > > I have been interested in the book *GEB *by Hofstadter

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

ly it concludes that in order for AI to be human-like it will >> need to understand analogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it >> to have a body! 🙂 >> >> >> https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-analogies-20210714/?mc_c

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

tingly it concludes that in order for AI to be human-like it will >>> need to understand analogy, the basis of abstraction, which may require it >>> to have a body! 🙂 >>> >>> >>> https://www.quantamagazine.org/melanie-mitchell-trains-ai-to-think-with-an

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

; >>> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> I know virtually nothing about AI, beyond what the letters stand for, >>>> but noticed this new article in Quanta Magazine. Does it pertain

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

>>> >>>> -- Paul >>>> >>>> On Wed, Jul 14, 2021, 1:38 PM Max Herman via NetBehaviour < >>>> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi all, >>>>> >>>>&

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

1, 1:38 PM Max Herman via NetBehaviour mailto:netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org>> wrote: Hi all, I know virtually nothing about AI, beyond what the letters stand for, but noticed this new article in Quanta Magazine. Does it pertain at all? Interestingly it concludes that in order for A

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

late 1980s argued the AI > based on the construction of a "knowledge base" was bound to fail. He made > the case that a robot adapting to an environment was far more likely to > achieve intelligence of the sort that humans demonstrate precisely because > it was embodied. Som

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

Paul Hertz >> *Sent:* Wednesday, July 14, 2021 2:36 PM >> *To:* NetBehaviour for networked distributed creativity < >> netbehaviour@lists.netbehaviour.org> >> *Cc:* Max Herman >> *Subject:* Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry >> >> There'

Re: [NetBehaviour] analogy and AI poetry

>>> able to do everything human intelligence can do might we not have to call >>> such an entity a natural form of intelligence? Confusinger and >>> confusinger. Norbert Wiener declared a distinction between human and >>> machine intelligence though and I think that&#