On 11/19/2018 2:21 PM, Brett Lymn wrote:
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 03:57:53PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
Think of it as having a similar function wrt the ILOM as the OBP has to
the OS in older Sun boxen.
No, this is a totally different processor, the SP is, effectively, a
separate computer that ha
On Sun, Nov 18, 2018 at 03:57:53PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
>
> [Of course, I suspect I'll uncover additional uses as I tinker more with
> it!]
>
Yep, I am sure there are plenty of things there :)
> Think of it as having a similar function wrt the ILOM as the OBP has to
> the OS in older Sun b
On 11/18/2018 2:09 PM, Brett Lymn wrote:
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 06:53:51PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
On 11/17/2018 1:52 PM, Brett Lymn wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:11:26PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
Yes, but what's the prompt BEFORE that (u-boot>)? And, where do I
find the capabilities, t
On Sat, Nov 17, 2018 at 06:53:51PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
> On 11/17/2018 1:52 PM, Brett Lymn wrote:
> >On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:11:26PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
> >>
> >>Yes, but what's the prompt BEFORE that (u-boot>)? And, where do I
> >>find the capabilities, there, documented?
> >
> >As s
On 11/18/2018 2:01 AM, Sad Clouds wrote:
On Sat, 17 Nov 2018 18:53:51 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
The earlier "u-boot" prompt is significant as it lets you tinker with
the "pre-Linux" environment. Among other things, it lets you erase
the Linux password so you CAN log into the SP (if you'd lost t
On 11/17/2018 1:52 PM, Brett Lymn wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:11:26PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
Yes, but what's the prompt BEFORE that (u-boot>)? And, where do I
find the capabilities, there, documented?
As someone else mentioned that is the Service Processor boot, it is a
cut down linu
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 02:11:26PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
>
> Yes, but what's the prompt BEFORE that (u-boot>)? And, where do I
> find the capabilities, there, documented?
>
As someone else mentioned that is the Service Processor boot, it is a
cut down linux image, IIRC running on powerpc. I
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:22:19 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
> So, it seems like there are a boat load of prompts -- "u-boot>",
> "->", "ok" ... And, nothing that seems to summarize ALL of
> the pertinent environments in which you can be interacting with
> the box.
You're getting confused between vario
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018, Julien Savard wrote:
Date: Thu, 15 Nov 2018 02:28:07
From: Julien Savard
To: netbsd-embed...@gmx.com
Cc: netbsd-users@netbsd.org
Subject: Re: Netra T5220
Unfortunately, as of 5 Nov 2017 (
http://mail-index.netbsd.org/port-sparc64/2017/11/05/msg002700.html ) and
On 11/16/2018 2:53 PM, Sad Clouds wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 13:22:19 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
So, it seems like there are a boat load of prompts -- "u-boot>",
"->", "ok" ... And, nothing that seems to summarize ALL of
the pertinent environments in which you can be interacting with
the box.
On 11/16/2018 1:56 PM, Brett Lymn wrote:
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
Version 3.0.10.4 r61032
Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
Warning: password is set to factory default.
-> version
SP firmware 3.0.10.4
SP firmware build nu
On Fri, Nov 16, 2018 at 01:22:19PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
> Version 3.0.10.4 r61032
>
> Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
>
> Warning: password is set to factory default.
>
> -> version
> SP firmware 3.0.10.4
> SP firmware build number: 61032
> SP firmware
On 11/16/2018 1:27 AM, Sad Clouds wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 01:01:18 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
[probably best to take this off list?]
I am hoping to make some time to play with this over the weekend
(or, over the holiday). Right now, its just "in the way" :-/
Not sure about your case spec
On Fri, 16 Nov 2018 01:01:18 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
> The banner says:
> U-Boot 1.1.1
>
>
> custom Sun Microsystems U-Boot 1.3
> ^^
>
> And, autoboots a Linux 2.4.22 kernel (which must reside on internal
> FLASH as it boots even with the drives pulled!)
>
> I am hoping to make some time
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:10:26 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
> This may well be the killer. Someone appears to have flashed a
> custom OFW image -- which I'll have to rid the machine of before I
> can do ANYTHING with it.
If someone put the latest firmware version there, then keep it. There
is probably
On 11/16/2018 12:05 AM, Sad Clouds wrote:
On Thu, 15 Nov 2018 22:10:26 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
This may well be the killer. Someone appears to have flashed a
custom OFW image -- which I'll have to rid the machine of before I
can do ANYTHING with it.
If someone put the latest firmware versio
On 11/15/2018 3:46 AM, Sad Clouds wrote:
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:00:06 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
I've rescued a Netra T5220 (haven't attached a console, yet).
2. Solaris 11.3 is pretty good and has many features not available
in NetBSD, such as LDOMs, Zones, ZFS, good multithreading
On Wed, 14 Nov 2018 17:00:06 -0700
Don NetBSD wrote:
> I've rescued a Netra T5220 (haven't attached a console, yet).
>
> I'm soliciting comments as to whether I should leave/install
> Slowaris on it or NetBSD. I think the Slowaris option gives
> me more "out
contact the
sparc64 port admin.
Choice is yours.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:00 PM Don NetBSD wrote:
> I've rescued a Netra T5220 (haven't attached a console, yet).
>
> I'm soliciting comments as to whether I should leave/install
> Slowaris on it or NetBSD. I think the Slow
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 05:00:06PM -0700, Don NetBSD wrote:
>
> I'm soliciting comments as to whether I should leave/install
> Slowaris on it or NetBSD. I think the Slowaris option gives
> me more "out-of-the-box" functionality (without having to
> build/install the apps I might want)
Unsure ab
I've rescued a Netra T5220 (haven't attached a console, yet).
I'm soliciting comments as to whether I should leave/install
Slowaris on it or NetBSD. I think the Slowaris option gives
me more "out-of-the-box" functionality (without having to
build/install the apps I might want)
21 matches
Mail list logo
