Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread Matthias Petermann
Hi, On 16.07.21 23:21, RVP wrote: On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Matthias Petermann wrote: I will overwrite the disk with zeros once as a test. According to the S.M.A.R.T. values, the number of "pending" sectors has already decreased - from 18 to 15. ``` 197 200    0 no  online  positive   

Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread RVP
On Fri, 16 Jul 2021, Matthias Petermann wrote: I will overwrite the disk with zeros once as a test. According to the S.M.A.R.T. values, the number of "pending" sectors has already decreased - from 18 to 15. ``` 197 2000 no online positiveCurrent pending sector 15 ``` I

Re: Regular NetBSD packaging and pkgin

2021-07-16 Thread Mark Carroll
On 12 Jul 2021, Greg Troxel wrote: > Benny Siegert writes: (snip) >> It sounds like pkgin and your pkg_* tools disagree on what the correct >> PKG_DBDIR is. Probably one of them is using /var/db/pkg and the other >> /usr/pkg/pkgdb. Check if you have both, set the location in the >> respective

Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread Matthias Petermann
Hi Michael, On 16.07.21 16:46, Michael van Elst wrote: smartmontools has more features and also understands rare setups with e.g. RAID controllers, early USB enclosures or vendor-specific (usually undocumented) parameters. It also comes with smartd to monitor drives continously. For plain

Re: cgd + zfs

2021-07-16 Thread Brandon Wickelhaus
I've not been brave enough to rely on zfs quite yet, but can confirm that for the most part cgd + raidframe work... though the autodetect can be a little problematic at times. In regard to the zfs + cgd, with the cgd atop the zfs volume... I am not sure that is wise based off of a thread a few

Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread Michael van Elst
m...@petermann-it.de (Matthias Petermann) writes: >On 14.07.21 14:10, Greg Troxel wrote: >> I think you may have uncovered a bug in zfs statistics. >>> NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM >>> tankONLINE 0 0 0 >>> raidz2-0 ONLINE 0

Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread Michael van Elst
m...@petermann-it.de (Matthias Petermann) writes: >Thank you very much for your valuable advice! I will add the=20 >smartmontools to my custom repository today so that I can install it on=20 >the NAS. In the meantime, I had another look at atactl - it seems to=20 >offer the possibility of reading

Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread Matthias Petermann
Hello Greg, On 14.07.21 14:10, Greg Troxel wrote: I think you may have uncovered a bug in zfs statistics. NAMESTATE READ WRITE CKSUM tankONLINE 0 0 0 raidz2-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 dk0 ONLINE 0

Re: ZFS RAIDZ2 and wd uncorrectable data error - why does ZFS not notice the hardware error?

2021-07-16 Thread Matthias Petermann
Hello all, Thank you very much for your valuable advice! I will add the smartmontools to my custom repository today so that I can install it on the NAS. In the meantime, I had another look at atactl - it seems to offer the possibility of reading out the error memory or starting a self-test.