Matthew Wilcox wrote:
The motivator for this was to fix the sparse warning:
drivers/net/e100.c:2418:48: warning: cast truncates bits from constant
value (83126e978d4fdf becomes 978d4fdf)
drivers/net/e100.c:2419:37: warning: cast truncates bits from constant
value (83126e978d4fdf becomes
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:33:14AM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Tested on the internal interface of an HP Integrity rx2600.
bad news, it's completely hosed. The adapter does some indistinguishable
blinking for a second, then stops blinking alltogether.
Weird. I tested it
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Nov 07, 2006 at 10:33:14AM -0800, Auke Kok wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Tested on the internal interface of an HP Integrity rx2600.
bad news, it's completely hosed. The adapter does some indistinguishable
blinking for a second, then stops blinking alltogether.
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:04:32PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
no objections, so I'll ACK it with the notion that I'm going to let our
labs do some more testing on it with all the latest changes to it.
Thanks, Auke. Here's the equivalent patch for e1000. I don't have a
The motivator for this was to fix the sparse warning:
drivers/net/e100.c:2418:48: warning: cast truncates bits from constant
value (83126e978d4fdf becomes 978d4fdf)
drivers/net/e100.c:2419:37: warning: cast truncates bits from constant
value (83126e978d4fdf becomes 978d4fdf)
Initially, I tried
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:11:55PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
The motivator for this was to fix the sparse warning:
drivers/net/e100.c:2418:48: warning: cast truncates bits from constant
value (83126e978d4fdf becomes 978d4fdf)
drivers/net/e100.c:2419:37: warning: cast truncates bits from
Jeff Garzik wrote:
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:11:55PM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
The motivator for this was to fix the sparse warning:
drivers/net/e100.c:2418:48: warning: cast truncates bits from constant
value (83126e978d4fdf becomes 978d4fdf)
drivers/net/e100.c:2419:37: warning: cast
On Thu, Oct 26, 2006 at 01:04:32PM -0700, Auke Kok wrote:
no objections, so I'll ACK it with the notion that I'm going to let our
labs do some more testing on it with all the latest changes to it.
Thanks, Auke. Here's the equivalent patch for e1000. I don't have a
convenient machine to test
