Good evening,
Bugzilla entry on this is now here:
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6484
Note the interesting fact that kernel mode PPPoE is not affected. Thus it
could also be a bug in Roaring Penguin's PPPoE program. The problem is
that all other user space implementations seem to b
On Sun, 30 Apr 2006, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I observed a 1-2 sec stalling behaviour for the complete system every
10 seconds or so _seemingly_ only when my ADSL connection was up.
I had that idea too, but that sounds different from what I have here. I
have also transfered lots of data at >9
> Going back to e100 helped
Sorry, I meant: Going back to eepro100 helped
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe netdev" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Maybe this is an issue of the e100 driver?
I observed a 1-2 sec stalling behaviour for the complete system every
10 seconds or so _seemingly_ only when my ADSL connection was up. That
was after I had changed the ethernet driver for a card _not_ connected
to the modem from eepro100 to e100.
After
Some more info:
- turning off Hyper Threading and using a uniprocessor kernel
did not improve things
- so didn't using 2.6.17rc3, in fact the bug manifested after
only 4 minutes with a 43 seconds gap
- those kernel debug watchdog routines don't detect anything
Going to try kernel PPPoE next
On Wed, 26 Apr 2006, Sven Schuster wrote:
but don't hold your breath waiting for me, kernel compile
takes more than two hours on my box :-)
Ouch. Takes 5/7 minutes here on the AMD64 resp. P4. Computer museum? :P
Anyhow, I tested PPP for 2.5 hours on the AMD64 the day before
yesterday with a b
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 03:07:33PM -0700, Andrew Morton told us:
> So there's something in -mm which fixes your kernel? It's usually the
> other way around ;)
actually this was the first time that I tried a "normal" kernel.
I haven't chosen to run -mm because it fixed something for m
Sven Schuster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:36:18AM +0200, Nuri Jawad told us:
> > Did you create a high load on the system in the manner I described?
> > The bug once only appeared after about 6 hours here when line + CPU had
> > been mostly idle. But that was the long
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:36:18AM +0200, Nuri Jawad told us:
> Did you create a high load on the system in the manner I described?
> The bug once only appeared after about 6 hours here when line + CPU had
> been mostly idle. But that was the longest time between failures. Can you
> test with one
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 26, 2006 at 02:36:18AM +0200, Nuri Jawad told us:
> >no problems here with pppoe, kernel is 2.6.17-rc1-mm1, ppp 2.4.4-b1.
>
> Did you create a high load on the system in the manner I described?
> The bug once only appeared after about 6 hours here when line + CPU had
> been most
no problems here with pppoe, kernel is 2.6.17-rc1-mm1, ppp 2.4.4-b1.
Did you create a high load on the system in the manner I described?
The bug once only appeared after about 6 hours here when line + CPU had
been mostly idle. But that was the longest time between failures. Can you
test with o
On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 02:02:59AM +0200, Andi Kleen told us:
> On Friday 21 April 2006 19:15, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> > On 4/21/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> > > We do seem to have had a few reports of ppp regressions around this
> > > timeframe.
> >
> > me too. I couldn
On Friday 21 April 2006 19:15, Jesse Brandeburg wrote:
> On 4/21/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We do seem to have had a few reports of ppp regressions around this
> > timeframe.
>
> me too. I couldn't use 2.6.16 at home on my pppoe connected router
> because it was so slow.
"Jesse Brandeburg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 4/21/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > We do seem to have had a few reports of ppp regressions around this
> > timeframe.
>
> me too. I couldn't use 2.6.16 at home on my pppoe connected router
> because it was so slow. I did
On 4/21/06, Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> We do seem to have had a few reports of ppp regressions around this
> timeframe.
me too. I couldn't use 2.6.16 at home on my pppoe connected router
because it was so slow. I didn't have time to debug. I can probably
try patches and provid
We do seem to have had a few reports of ppp regressions around this
timeframe.
Begin forwarded message:
Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2006 23:28:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Nuri Jawad <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Bug: PPP dropouts in >=2.6.16
Good evening,
I've recently had pr
16 matches
Mail list logo
