Andy Bierman writes:
>This draft addresses all remaining open issues, include the rewrite of the
>opstate section.
>>In YANG, any data that has a "config" statement value of "false"
>>could be considered operational data. The relationship between
>>configuration (i.e., "config" statement
Hi,
This draft addresses all remaining open issues, include the rewrite of the
opstate section.
I think it is ready for another quick WGLC and then back to the IESG.
Andy
On Sun, Jun 18, 2017 at 9:54 PM, wrote:
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts
> director
Hi Michael,
On 6/19/17, 3:20 AM, "netmod on behalf of wangzitao"
wrote:
>Hi Authors,
>
>I have read this draft and think it is very useful. However, IMHO, there
>are also something need to improved. For example:
># In section2 Tree Diagram Syntax, it describes " ! for a presence
>container", b
Hi Authors,
I have read this draft and think it is very useful. However, IMHO, there are
also something need to improved. For example:
# In section2 Tree Diagram Syntax, it describes " ! for a presence container",
but in some draft/ RFC the container not be marked by "!", for example
"ietf-int