On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:05:15PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
>
> Hence, for me, I see the choice as:
> 1) do we publish the existing model now (perhaps also mark the draft as
> experimental) followed by an updated draft with the NMDA compatible module?
> 2) do we publish both models in a single
Robert Wilton writes:
> On 17/01/2018 16:40, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>
>
>
Ok. I'm ok with keeping the inline case as it is. However, I think
>>> I don't agree. The metadata annotation solves real issues.
>> One issue with the annotation is that since the schema
Kent Watsen writes:
> Hi Dean,
>
> "As Lou mentioned, schema mount can be used with or without YANG library. As
> author who uses the schema mount in a draft and in product, don’t want to
> hold back the publication. We, IETF, are too slow. Getting data model RFCs
> published takes too much ti
Juergen Schoenwaelder writes:
> On Fri, Jan 19, 2018 at 06:05:15PM +, Robert Wilton wrote:
>>
>> Hence, for me, I see the choice as:
>> 1) do we publish the existing model now (perhaps also mark the draft as
>> experimental) followed by an updated draft with the NMDA compatible module?
>> 2)
Hi Mahesh,
Thanks, it doesn't get much more concrete then a pull request ;)
Okay, so from a chair/shepherd perspective, can folks please consider this
update to -15 as the LC solution to removing the open issue Juergen found in
the draft?
As a contributor, I don't think the name of the groupi
Hi Lada,
My primary concern is that the YANG Schema Mount delay will not only hold the
NI/LNE but all the models that are dependent on them (e.g., L2VPN and L3VPN).
This is for a document that has already finished WG Last Call. Additionally,
your estimate for the size of the change and time to
+1, with Acee
Cheers,
Jeff
On 1/22/18, 08:18, "netmod on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)"
wrote:
Hi Lada,
My primary concern is that the YANG Schema Mount delay will not only hold
the NI/LNE but all the models that are dependent on them (e.g., L2VPN and
L3VPN). This is for a docum
Dear all,
Since almost everyone who spoke up in the WG preferred option 2, let's
go with that one.
Martin, can you please post a new draft version.
This document is on the IESG telechat this Thursday.
Regards, Benoit
Hi Martin,
We agree with option 2.
Regards, Bart
-Original Message--
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : A YANG Data Model for Hardware Management
Authors : Andy Bierman
Martin Bjorklund
Acee,
the documents that have already finished WG Last Call have a normative
reference on schema mount, which has not yet finished WG Last Call as
far as I recall. I think the RFC editor does not publish a document
with a missing normative reference. I continue to believe that the
time difference
It was WG Last Call’ed:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/csUvs6408En0yY-vapyU3IFcJqQ
And it was closed:
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/netmod/gbXE4Le1I_3Y5oaNnpjYoZZZ4lw
However, it may not have ever completed.
Thanks,
Acee
On 1/22/18, 11:45 AM, "Juergen Schoenwaelder"
w
Thanks. The longer WG last call thread started with Rob's message in
which he also asked about alignment with the YANG library update
(posted November 2nd). So the document is in a limbo state since
November 6th.
/js
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 04:58:15PM +, Acee Lindem (acee) wrote:
> It was WG
Hi Kent and Mahesh and Sonal,
Thanks very much for working on this draft. I have noted one problem
that I think needs correcting. I come prepared with a diff.
The current model has {source,dest}-port-or-range hanging off ipv4 or
ipv6. This is a transport parameter and is not appropriate for
pr
Thank you all for the important discussion since the completion of WGLC on Nov
6th.
Per normal process, drafts typically progress once LC comments are address
unless significant faults are found. Post LC comments have been made, which
needed consideration, notably the relationship with NMDA a
Eliot,
I am not sure about what is a basic function, and what is not. Tomorrow,
somebody can argue that TCP SYN flag is a basic function and should be broken
out from under the TCP header.
I would rather that port definition remain under TCP/UDP with the feature
statement ‘match-on-tcp’ and ‘m
I'm ok with this as well, Mahesh.
Thanks,
Eliot
On 22.01.18 22:48, Mahesh Jethanandani wrote:
> Eliot,
>
> I am not sure about what is a basic function, and what is not.
> Tomorrow, somebody can argue that TCP SYN flag is a basic function and
> should be broken out from under the TCP header.
>
Hi,
Good point - adding on to that, I'd like to point out that there are more
protocols that use ports besides TCP and UDP, such as SCTP and DCCP.
If the port number was not protocol-specific then devices would also have to
match SCTP ports, DCCP ports, and other protocol ports, even for proto
Greetings,
This WGLC is concluded.
We have consensus to advance the document.
The authors should submit an update reflecting the result of the
dicussion on the text representation of tree diagrams not being usable
by machine parsers.
The exchange between Robert Wilton and Martin Bjorkland I thi
On 22.01.18 23:02, Alex Campbell wrote:
>
>
> Hi,
>
>
> Good point - adding on to that, I'd like to point out that there are
> more protocols that use ports besides TCP and UDP, such as SCTP and DCCP.
> If the port number was not protocol-specific then devices would also
> have to match SCTP port
Hi,
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
> Thanks. The longer WG last call thread started with Rob's message in
> which he also asked about alignment with the YANG library update
> (posted November 2nd). So the document is in a lim
Andy Bierman wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Juergen Schoenwaelder <
> j.schoenwael...@jacobs-university.de> wrote:
>
> > Thanks. The longer WG last call thread started with Rob's message in
> > which he also asked about alignment with the YANG library update
> > (posted Nov
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the Network Modeling WG of the IETF.
Title : YANG Tree Diagrams
Authors : Martin Bjorklund
Lou Berger
Filename:
22 matches
Mail list logo
