On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 8:34 AM Andy Bierman wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 5:06 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have some mostly cosmetic comments on this draft.
>>
>> o "YANG" should be spelled "YANG". Not Yang etc.
>>
>>
>> o "NETCONF" should be spelled "NETCONF".
>>
On Thu, Oct 10, 2019 at 5:06 AM Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have some mostly cosmetic comments on this draft.
>
> o "YANG" should be spelled "YANG". Not Yang etc.
>
>
> o "NETCONF" should be spelled "NETCONF".
>
>
> o leaf-list module
>
> The type of this leaf-list is a stri
On Thu, 2019-10-10 at 14:07 +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > some of you have probably seen the discussions around
> >
> > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
> >
> > We proposed to adopt it as a work item in the DNSOP WG
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> some of you have probably seen the discussions around
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
>
> We proposed to adopt it as a work item in the DNSOP WG, but despite
> some support this is probably not going to happen. The subs
Hi,
I have some mostly cosmetic comments on this draft.
o "YANG" should be spelled "YANG". Not Yang etc.
o "NETCONF" should be spelled "NETCONF".
o leaf-list module
The type of this leaf-list is a string with:
pattern '.+@\d{4}-\d{2}-\d{2}\.yang';
I think the revisi
Hi,
some of you have probably seen the discussions around
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-lhotka-dnsop-iana-class-type-yang-02
We proposed to adopt it as a work item in the DNSOP WG, but despite some support
this is probably not going to happen. The substantial objections are:
1. It is not go
Hi,
there is at least one YANG 1.0 standard module that imports and uses
groupings from a YANG 1.1 standard module and at least one such grouping
contains must/when statements referencing XPath functions that are not
available in 1.0 XPath context.
The modules I'm referring to are part of RF
Michal Vaško wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yanglint actually validates the module just fine (at least the latest
> version) once the grammar errors are fixed. Namely, the spaces before
> ";" on lines 191 and 199 are removed.
These are not errors. You are allowed to have any number of
whitespace (and comment
Hi,
Balázs Lengyel wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to validate the attached model. However pyang keeps complaining
> about refining a default for a leaf-list:
>
>
>
> ietf-notification-capabilit...@2019-10-10.yang:184: error: "leaf-list" node
> "ietf-notification-capabilities::supported-exc
Hi,
yanglint actually validates the module just fine (at least the latest version)
once the grammar errors are fixed. Namely, the spaces before ";" on lines 191
and 199 are removed.
Regards,
Michal
On Wednesday, October 9, 2019 23:13 CEST, Mahesh Jethanandani
wrote:
> Hi Balasz,
>
> In g
10 matches
Mail list logo