Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

From: Acee Lindem (acee) Sent: 15 August 2020 21:03 Hi Tom, On 8/15/20, 8:25 AM, "tom petch" wrote: From: Tarek Saad Sent: 14 August 2020 17:24 Hi Acee and Tom, The authors of ID: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang met and we discussed the points below. We understand that RFC83

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

Folks, Many messages for this thread are being blocked by the list server, requiring manual effort by the chairs to release them. Here are the headers from one such message: To: Tarek Saad , tom petch , "Rob Wilton (rwilton)" , RFC Errata System , "lho...@nic.cz" , "yingzhen...@huawei.com"

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

Hi Acee and Tom, The authors of ID: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang met and we discussed the points below. We understand that RFC8349 defines an AF-agnostic model for RIBs. RFC8349 defined only two types of RIBs (IPv4 and IPv6 RIBs), but we envision other types of RIBs too (e.g. L2 RIB, MCAST RIB, et

Re: [netmod] [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

Hi Tarek, Can you also add the description of the native MPLS RIB to the text? Thanks, Acee On 8/14/20, 12:27 PM, "mpls on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: Hi Tarek, This works for me. Thanks, Acee On 8/14/20, 12:25 PM, "Tarek Saad" wrote: Hi Acee and Tom,

Re: [netmod] [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

Thanks Acee. Yes, will do in the next rev we'll push soon. Regards, Tarek On 8/14/20, 12:29 PM, "mpls on behalf of Acee Lindem (acee)" wrote: Hi Tarek, Can you also add the description of the native MPLS RIB to the text? Thanks, Acee On 8/14/20, 12:27 PM, "mpls on behal

Re: [netmod] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

Hi Tarek, This works for me. Thanks, Acee On 8/14/20, 12:25 PM, "Tarek Saad" wrote: Hi Acee and Tom, The authors of ID: draft-ietf-mpls-base-yang met and we discussed the points below. We understand that RFC8349 defines an AF-agnostic model for RIBs. RFC8349 defined only two typ

Re: [netmod] [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

From: Tarek Saad Sent: 14 August 2020 17:30 Thanks Acee. Yes, will do in the next rev we'll push soon. Tarek, In the same vein, having introductory text to each of the YANG tree diagrams would have helped me to understand what was intended. As it stands, I reverse engineer the YANG to find

Re: [netmod] [mpls] [Technical Errata Reported] RFC8349 (6251)

Hi Acee, Tarek, Tom, Thank for all for your time and help in resolving this issue. I will reject the erratum. Regards, Rob > -Original Message- > From: Tarek Saad > Sent: 14 August 2020 17:30 > To: Acee Lindem (acee) ; Tarek Saad > ; tom petch ; Rob Wilton (rwilton) > ; RFC Errata Sys

[netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-05 Please voice your support or objections on list before August 31. Notes: 1) -03 was presented during the 108 session, hence the I-D has been updated twice since then. 2) Ple

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

___ netmod mailing list netmod@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/netmod

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

Hi all， I have reviewed the latest version, my comments are addressed, I support adoption. Best Regrads, Wei 发件人: w13070197...@outlook.com 发送时间: 2020年8月18日 9:08 收件人: Kent Watsen; netmod 主题: Re: [netmod] Adoptio

Re: [netmod] Adoption poll for draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags

On Mon, Aug 17, 2020 at 10:05:27PM +, Kent Watsen wrote: > This email begins a 2-week adoption poll for: > > https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-tao-netmod-yang-node-tags-05 > > Please voice your support or objections on list before August 31. > > Notes: >1) -03 was presented during