I think the use “must” for state data makes sense, the logic in my
understanding, is the state data can not be modified by the management system,
if we allow error-message to be sent to the management system,
It doesn’t help for the management system since the management is not allowed
to modif
Here is what RFC 7950 says:
7.5.4.1. The "error-message" Statement
The "error-message" statement, which is optional, takes a string as
an argument. If the constraint evaluates to "false", the string is
passed as in the in NETCONF.
Since state data is not (directly) modified
Interesting, Per, thanks for the notice.
-Qin
-邮件原件-
发件人: netmod [mailto:netmod-boun...@ietf.org] 代表 Per Andersson (perander)
发送时间: 2023年10月31日 21:24
收件人: hackat...@ietf.org
抄送: 'netmod@ietf.org'
主题: [netmod] IETF 118 Hackathon for Revision Label in YANG tooling
Hi!
I just registered th
