One of the actions from the last Interim meeting was to have both sides
of the issues around the open config approach to create at least slides/textual
bullet points for use during our discussion in Praha so we can come to a
conclusion around the final issues. We need these
Hi,
Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com wrote:
One of the actions from the last Interim meeting was to have both
sides of the issues around the open config approach to create at least
slides/textual bullet points for use during our discussion in Praha so
we can
thats a good start. lets please discuss the merits and pros/cons vs the open
cconfig proposal.
On Jul 6, 2015, at 3:59 PM, Martin Bjorklund m...@tail-f.com wrote:
Hi,
Nadeau Thomas tnad...@lucidvision.com wrote:
One of the actions from the last Interim meeting was to have both
fantastic!
On Jul 6, 2015, at 4:14 PM, Anees Shaikh aasha...@google.com wrote:
We've posted a new version of our draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01
It includes a section on the issues that were raised and our
observation/comment. It also adds a
We've posted a new version of our draft:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-openconfig-netmod-opstate-01
It includes a section on the issues that were raised and our
observation/comment. It also adds a detailed section on terminology based
on the interim calls, and updates the operational
