Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:48:27PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > - The second paragraph then says: > > > >If the "require-instance" property (Section 9.9.3) is "true", > >there MUST exist an node in the data tree, or a node with a > >default value in use (see Section 7.6.1 and Sec

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-16 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This > > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the > > IESG process. A big thanks in partic

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-16 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote: > Hi, > > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the > IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir > reviewer

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-10 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
> On 10 Jun 2016, at 15:48, Martin Bjorklund wrote: > > Ladislav Lhotka wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref >> issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: >> >> - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list >>

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-10 Thread Martin Bjorklund
Ladislav Lhotka wrote: > Hi, > > I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref > issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: > > - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list > - schema node - OK. > > - The second paragraph then says: > >

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-10 Thread Ladislav Lhotka
Hi, I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct: - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list schema node - OK. - The second paragraph then says: If the "require-instance" property (Section 9

Re: [netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-10 Thread Benoit Claise
Thank you Jürgen and Martin. The document really improved IMO. Regards, Benoit Hi, Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir reviewers

[netmod] YANG 1.1 final review of the edits resulting from the IESG process

2016-06-10 Thread Juergen Schoenwaelder
Hi, Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir reviewers and to Martin for following up on the issues. Please check the edits do make sure