On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 03:48:27PM +0200, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
> > - The second paragraph then says:
> >
> >If the "require-instance" property (Section 9.9.3) is "true",
> >there MUST exist an node in the data tree, or a node with a
> >default value in use (see Section 7.6.1 and Sec
Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This
> > revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the
> > IESG process. A big thanks in partic
On Fri, Jun 10, 2016 at 01:06:42PM +0200, Juergen Schoenwaelder wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This
> revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the
> IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir
> reviewer
> On 10 Jun 2016, at 15:48, Martin Bjorklund wrote:
>
> Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref
>> issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct:
>>
>> - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list
>>
Ladislav Lhotka wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref
> issue, but I think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct:
>
> - The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list
> - schema node - OK.
>
> - The second paragraph then says:
>
>
Hi,
I don't want to open a new round of discussion about the leafref issue, but I
think the text in sec. 9.9 isn't correct:
- The first paragraph says that "path" refers to a leaf or leaf-list schema
node - OK.
- The second paragraph then says:
If the "require-instance" property (Section 9
Thank you Jürgen and Martin.
The document really improved IMO.
Regards, Benoit
Hi,
Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This
revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the
IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir
reviewers
Hi,
Martin has posted revision -13 of the YANG 1.1 specification. This
revision incorporates all comments that we have received during the
IESG process. A big thanks in particular to our gen-art and ops-dir
reviewers and to Martin for following up on the issues. Please check
the edits do make sure