Re: Dev Cl #1717 -- bug-tracker peeve

2014-02-13 Thread Jim Nagel
Brian Bailey wrote on 11 Feb: ... I'm not into guessology. # is not a British convention anyway so far as I am aware, for some 80ish years, it's a hindrance! Why put it there when it serves no useful purpose, I ask? You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker could simply ignore the # if

Re: Dev Cl #1717 -- bug-tracker peeve

2014-02-13 Thread Richard Porter
On 13 Feb 2014 Jim Nagel wrote: You'd think the software behind the bug-tracker could simply ignore the # if people type it in this box. It would seem natural enough for a user to type it, since # is shown loudclear in the Netsurf info box as part of the version number. Well there is a #

Re: Dev Cl #1717 -- bug-tracker peeve

2014-02-13 Thread Jim Nagel
Rob Kendrick wrote on 13 Feb: ...back then the same issue happened (occurs in revision field not accepting an r) and yet nobody complained! My point was just a general one that software needs to anticipate that different users might input stuff in ways that are obvious with hindsight. --

dates of !Boot and !System within download

2014-02-13 Thread Jim Nagel
I have just downloaded the current development version, NetSurf-gcc-json-1718/zip and am in the throes of installing it on several machines here. Datestamps on the !Boot and !System folders and all their contents were lost again sometime before 2014-02-04 (possibly before 2013-04-25, which is

Re: dates of !Boot and !System within download

2014-02-13 Thread Brian Jordan
In article 9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote: [Snip] Suggestion to the Netsurf team: Please, could you include an extra Readme-date file in the download zipfile that would simply state in plain text the date of the last actual change and words to

Re: dates of !Boot and !System within download

2014-02-13 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 12:56:17PM +, Brian Jordan wrote: I work on the assumption that if a merge-boot or merge-system is required that NetSurf will let me know with an appropriate message. Otherwise I just let NetSurf get on with it. Am I under vigilant or are you over vigilant? It

Re: dates of !Boot and !System within download

2014-02-13 Thread Jim Nagel
Brian Jordan wrote on 13 Feb: In article 9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote: Suggestion to the Netsurf team: Please, could you include an extra Readme-date file in the download zipfile that would simply state in plain text the date of the last

Re: dates of !Boot and !System within download

2014-02-13 Thread george greenfield
In message bb6367d953@abbeypress.net Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote: Brian Jordan wrote on 13 Feb: In article 9b5f51d953@abbeypress.net, Jim Nagel nets...@abbeypress.co.uk wrote: Suggestion to the Netsurf team: Please, could you include an extra