On 16 Jan, Steve Fryatt wrote in message
:
> That may be true, but I've asked groups of RISC OS users to take on some
> of the more "paper shuffling" tasks that I've been doing for the platform
> over the last six months, to free up the time that I required for looking
> at NetSurf. They were
In article ,
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 15 Jan, Michael Bell wrote in message
> <9d6e16da50.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>:
> > In message <20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
> > Rob Kendrick wrote:
> >
[Snip]
> That may be true, but I've asked groups
In message
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> That may be true, but I've asked groups of RISC OS users to take on some of
> the more "paper shuffling" tasks that I've been doing for the platform over
> the last six months, to free up the time that I required for looking at
> NetSurf.
Golly, I'll t
On 16 Jan 2010 Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 15 Jan, Michael Bell wrote in message
> <9d6e16da50.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>:
>> In message <20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
>> Rob Kendrick wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps 5 to 10 years of experience to learn C a
In message
Steve Fryatt wrote:
> On 15 Jan, Michael Bell wrote in message
> <9d6e16da50.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>:
>> In message <20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
>> Rob Kendrick wrote:
>>
>>> Perhaps 5 to 10 years of experience to lea
In message
Steve Fryatt wrote:
>On 15 Jan, Michael Bell wrote in message
><9d6e16da50.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>:
>
>> In message <20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
>> Rob Kendrick wrote:
>>
>> > Perhaps 5 to 10 years of experience to lea
On 15 Jan, Michael Bell wrote in message
<9d6e16da50.michaelb...@michael.beaverbell.co.uk>:
> In message <20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
> Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
> > Perhaps 5 to 10 years of experience to learn C and using the WIMP from C
> > before you start
In message <20100115164601.gc5...@digital-scurf.org>
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:29:28PM +, David Pitt wrote:
>> Maybe the missing ingredient in the RISC OS community is youth.
> It's exceedingly hard to persuade youth to latch onto a community which
> cu
In message <20100115131610.5b82a...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:57:37 GMT
> Kevin Wells wrote:
>> In message <20100115003457.0d6d2...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
>> Rob Kendrick wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>Absolutely. Just because w
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 04:29:28PM +, David Pitt wrote:
> Maybe the missing ingredient in the RISC OS community is youth.
It's exceedingly hard to persuade youth to latch onto a community which
currently lacks it.
> I had a bit of a google to try to get some background to a Netsurf
> develope
Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:16:47PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > > How much work is involved for some one who knows no C at all.
>
> > That entirely depends on the person.
>
> > When I learned C, it took me about a week of evenings to become
> > reasonably com
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:16:47PM +, Daniel Silverstone wrote:
> > How much work is involved for some one who knows no C at all.
> That entirely depends on the person.
> When I learned C, it took me about a week of evenings to become reasonably
> competent.
To put this in context; when I le
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:57:37PM +, Kevin Wells wrote:
> >Absolutely. Just because we're dropping it now doesn't mean we'll
> >refuse it later. Although the longer it is left, the more work will be
> >required.
> How much work is involved for some one who knows no C at all.
That entirely d
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 12:57:37 GMT
Kevin Wells wrote:
> In message <20100115003457.0d6d2...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
> Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
> >
> >Absolutely. Just because we're dropping it now doesn't mean we'll
> >refuse it later. Although the longer it is left, the more work
In message <20100115003457.0d6d2...@trite.i.flarn.net.i.flarn.net>
Rob Kendrick wrote:
>
>Absolutely. Just because we're dropping it now doesn't mean we'll
>refuse it later. Although the longer it is left, the more work will be
>required.
How much work is involved for some one who kn
On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 00:31:15 GMT
Bryan Hogan wrote:
> > NetSurf 2.5 is likely to be the last release for RISC OS.
>
> :-(
>
> I take it none of those who were looking at taking on the RISC OS
> frontend were able to commit the necessary time to it?
Indeed. There is a shortage of people who
In message <50d979b0e4t...@netsurf-browser.org>
Michael Drake wrote:
> The NetSurf developers plan to release NetSurf 2.5 at the
> Wakefield RISC OS Show this year.
Excellent, something to look forward to!
> We also hope for speed improvements in parsing of HTML and CSS,
> as well as
The NetSurf developers plan to release NetSurf 2.5 at the
Wakefield RISC OS Show this year.
http://www.wakefieldshow.org.uk/
The release is expected to have many bug fixes over the current
release version (NetSurf 2.1), in addition to major new
features, such as:
+ Rewritten and more ca
18 matches
Mail list logo
