Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-17 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Geer
Michael Drake wrote: > On 16/12/15 14:27, Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > I can reproduce this, but I don't think it's related to my > > problem. I do not get an error, it just starts NetSurf and no > > page is loaded. > Can you reproduce your problem with the NetSurf 3.3 release > version? M

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Steve Fryatt
On 16 Dec, Brian wrote in message <5532ee3585bbai...@argonet.co.uk>: > In article <73bae93255.jan-j...@armx6.gmx.com>, >Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > Brian wrote: > > > > Not wishing to cause confusion, but why would one wish to work that > > > way, as above? Don't get it at the mome

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Michael Drake
On 16/12/15 14:27, Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: I can reproduce this, but I don't think it's related to my problem. I do not get an error, it just starts NetSurf and no page is loaded. Can you reproduce your problem with the NetSurf 3.3 release version? -- Michael Drake

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Brian
In article <73bae93255.jan-j...@armx6.gmx.com>, Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > Brian wrote: > > > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer > > > wrote: > > > > - Quit NetSurf > > > > - Open a taskwindow > > > > - Enter: > > > > *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ > > > > What happens? > > > >

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Geer
Allan Bennett wrote: > I have an obey file on my pinboard containing several (6) > *uridispatch commands. This worked OK until the RO 5.23 upgrade, > after which an error occurred for all but one website from the > list - at which point !Netsurf loaded and so did the one site. > Loading the Ac

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Geer
Brian wrote: > > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer > > wrote: > > > - Quit NetSurf > > > - Open a taskwindow > > > - Enter: > > > *uridispatch http://www.ikke.no/ > > > What happens? > > > I would expect NetSurf to start and open a window with > > > www.ikke.no. > Not wishing to cause

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Allan Bennett
In message Allan Bennett wrote: > In message <50cad93255.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> > Peter Young wrote: >> On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: >>> Brian wrote: In article , Peter Young wrote: > No idea, but I've also never had a problem with

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Allan Bennett
In message <50cad93255.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk> Peter Young wrote: > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: >> Brian wrote: >>> In article , Peter Young >>> wrote: No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a link in Messenger Pro, unless it's

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Brian
In article <50cad93255.pnyo...@pnyoung.ormail.co.uk>, Peter Young wrote: > On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > Brian wrote: > >> In article , Peter Young > >> wrote: > >>> No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a > >>> link in Messenger Pro, unless it's o

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Peter Young
On 16 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > Brian wrote: >> In article , Peter Young >> wrote: >>> No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a >>> link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open >>> anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! >> Also, perhaps not ver

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Geer
Brian wrote: > In article , Peter Young > wrote: > > No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a > > link in Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open > > anyway. Sorry not to be helpful! > Also, perhaps not very helpful, clicking on a link in Pluto, so > far as

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread David Pitt
Dave Symes, on 16 Dec, wrote: > In article , >Peter Young wrote: > [Snippy] > > No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I have > > no idea who wrote it. > > Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says > it is 1.04 (May 2006) [snip]

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Peter Young
On 16 Dec 2015 Peter Young wrote: > On 16 Dec 2015 Dave Symes wrote: >> In article , >>Peter Young wrote: >> [Snippy] >>> No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I >>> have no idea who wrote it. >> Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 i

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Brian
In article , Peter Young wrote: > On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > Peter Young wrote: > >> On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: [snip] > No idea, but I've also never had a problem with clicking on a link in > Messenger Pro, unless it's one that NetSurf can't open any

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Peter Young
On 16 Dec 2015 Dave Symes wrote: > In article , >Peter Young wrote: > [Snippy] >> No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I >> have no idea who wrote it. > Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says > it is 1.04 (May 2006) Same he

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-16 Thread Dave Symes
In article , Peter Young wrote: [Snippy] > No idea about AcornURI, mine seems to be 0.25, (02 Sep 2013), but I > have no idea who wrote it. Strange business, the AcornURI I have on my ROOL RISC OS 5.22 install says it is 1.04 (May 2006) Dave RISC OS 6.20 is AcornURI 0.12 D. -- Dave Tri

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-15 Thread Peter Young
On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > Peter Young wrote: >> On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: >>> "Chris Young" wrote: On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A > further double click

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-15 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Geer
Peter Young wrote: > On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > > "Chris Young" wrote: > >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > > > > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A > > > > further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. > > > > P

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-15 Thread Peter Young
On 15 Dec 2015 Jan-Jaap van der Geer wrote: > "Chris Young" wrote: >> On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: >>> Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A >>> further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. >>> Previously, a single double click on the

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-12-15 Thread Jan-Jaap van der Geer
"Chris Young" wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A > > further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. > > Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all that > > was needed to load the

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-11-27 Thread Brian
In article , Chris Young wrote: > On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A further > > double click is now needed to load the HTML file. Previously, a single > > double click on the file icon was all that was needed to lo

Re: Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-11-27 Thread Chris Young
On Thu, 26 Nov 2015 08:08:31 + (GMT), Brian wrote: > Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A further double > click is now needed to load the HTML file. Previously, a single double > click on the file icon was all that was needed to load the file into > NerSurf. This was my

Slightly odd behaviour #3225

2015-11-26 Thread Brian
Double clicking on an HTML icon now only loads NetSurf. A further double click is now needed to load the HTML file. Previously, a single double click on the file icon was all that was needed to load the file into NerSurf.