On 22 Apr 2013 Tim Hill wrote:
>> I have reported this to
>> the council but I won't hold my breath for a correction.
> Seems okay two days later, Monday.
Yes, I've now had a message to say they've resized the images.
>> The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page
>> be
In article , Richard Porter
wrote:
> I've encountered a minor irritation caused by a stupid web authoring
> mistake. The RBWM Recycling page at
> http://www.rbwm.gov.uk/web/wm_recycling.htm contains two images which
> are delivered at 2440 x 1479 px and displayed at 122 x 89 px - the
> files are 3
On 21 Apr 2013 Rob Kendrick wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
>> I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was
>> wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy
>> of the resized image in its cache, which would save a l
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote:
> I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was
> wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy
> of the resized image in its cache, which would save a lot of
> processing time in such circums
On 21 Apr 2013 Brian Jordan wrote:
> In article ,
>Richard Porter wrote:
> [Snip]
>> The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page
>> becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a
>> guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as
In article ,
Richard Porter wrote:
[Snip]
> The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page
> becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a
> guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as it
> tries to move them around.
Almost certa
I've encountered a minor irritation caused by a stupid web authoring
mistake. The RBWM Recycling page at
http://www.rbwm.gov.uk/web/wm_recycling.htm
contains two images which are delivered at 2440 x 1479 px and
displayed at 122 x 89 px - the files are 340 times the size they need
to be! I have r