Re: Squashed image problem

2013-04-22 Thread Richard Porter
On 22 Apr 2013 Tim Hill wrote: >> I have reported this to >> the council but I won't hold my breath for a correction. > Seems okay two days later, Monday. Yes, I've now had a message to say they've resized the images. >> The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page >> be

Re: Squashed image problem

2013-04-22 Thread Tim Hill
In article , Richard Porter wrote: > I've encountered a minor irritation caused by a stupid web authoring > mistake. The RBWM Recycling page at > http://www.rbwm.gov.uk/web/wm_recycling.htm contains two images which > are delivered at 2440 x 1479 px and displayed at 122 x 89 px - the > files are 3

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-21 Thread Richard Porter
On 21 Apr 2013 Rob Kendrick wrote: > On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote: >> I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was >> wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy >> of the resized image in its cache, which would save a l

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-21 Thread Rob Kendrick
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 10:06:49AM +0100, Richard Porter wrote: > I don't think there's anything I can do other than that. I was > wondering whether there's a design reason why NS doesn't keep a copy > of the resized image in its cache, which would save a lot of > processing time in such circums

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-21 Thread Richard Porter
On 21 Apr 2013 Brian Jordan wrote: > In article , >Richard Porter wrote: > [Snip] >> The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page >> becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a >> guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as

Re: [Bulk] Squashed image problem

2013-04-20 Thread Brian Jordan
In article , Richard Porter wrote: [Snip] > The problem is that as soon as these images hove into view the page > becomes incredibly slow and clunky to move around. I would hazard a > guess that NS is continually struggling to resize the images as it > tries to move them around. Almost certa

Squashed image problem

2013-04-20 Thread Richard Porter
I've encountered a minor irritation caused by a stupid web authoring mistake. The RBWM Recycling page at http://www.rbwm.gov.uk/web/wm_recycling.htm contains two images which are delivered at 2440 x 1479 px and displayed at 122 x 89 px - the files are 340 times the size they need to be! I have r