Like Sean I’ve been active long ago, lurking for a decade or more. It’s good
to be prodded to contribute. I thought of jumping in during some of the recent
discussions, notably the ‘Rage against the machine’ thread, but unsure about
how my writing will fit in, as I have been writing fiction
Adrian - I'd agree with all of that - but can you say a bit more about
the last bit:
"working out how we carry that forward into ways to manufacture
everything else"
R.
On 12/06/2019 21:20, Adrian McEwen wrote:
I think the points both of you make are important. Everyone should
have the
I think the points both of you make are important. Everyone should have
the agency (if they choose to use it, not everyone has to be a maker) to
make whatever they like /and/ we should be helping those who want to
build businesses around their making to do so and succeed.
In DoES Liverpool
Absolutely,
check this out:
http://stopmotionstudies.net/pdf/bohm_07_07.pdf
and
http://turbulence.org/spotlight/crawford/index.html
#Bohm
Best N
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 12. Juni 2019 um 21:40 Uhr
Von: "Max Herman"
An: "nettime-l@mail.kein.org"
Betreff: Two possible books for discussion?
Hi all,
I recently found out about David Bohm's 1996 book On Dialogue, and have been
interested in Italo Calvino's Six Memos for the Next Millennium for a couple of
years.
Are either of these relevant for or about discussion approaches?
Thanks,
Max
# distributed via : no commercial use
James - I think from my point of view the greatest value of the maker
movement has been an explosion of people making things that don't
entirely make sense and that are not intended as commercial ventures.
That's not an issue, that's the point. They are learning that they can
pull ideas out of
On 6/11/19 5:27 PM, Jaromil wrote:
> dear Bruce and nettimers,
>
[...]
> 3. the "shamanic" value that can be embedded in uses of technologies,
>as opposed to the sanitized and rational interpretation given by
>designers in the west. Techno-shamanism is something Fabi Borges,
>Vicky
Hi Adrian,
I'm really interested in this comment:
"There are people in the space who see it as a way to bootstrap their
startup, and there is a risk that it can be exploited by someone only
out for themselves, but the culture of the space mostly manages to
protect itself from that."
My
Hi Renée,
RE: I tend to make egregious typos & grammatical mistakes that I don't catch
until it's about a week later.
Same with me, i'm dyslexic and much prefer making and programming as a way to
understand the world. On social media, particularly Twitter, I've learnt not to
worry so much,
This sentence is the nettime problem in a nutshell
>why narrow it down to your favourite
> prejudices ?
# distributed via : no commercial use without permission
#is a moderated mailing list for net criticism,
# collaborative text filtering and cultural politics of the nets
# more info:
nina, i take the liberty to comment on your message anyway, since i fail
to get the joke.
why override the good intention? why narrow it down to your favourite
prejudices? everybody who posts here and makes him- or herself visible
to others would (in this "convivial dream nettime") be a
Dear Andreas,
I know you mean it in a good way and are simply speculating...
...but just as little reminder - "mentor system": Yikes, that is
the perfect tool to render it most likely that hierarchies reproduce
themselves. It is gonna be like the vatican then. o_O
Also, as the problem of the
Is the death of Make the rebirth of nettime? ;-) Mostly joking, but
given this has turned a few lurkers into posters (me included), maybe we
just need some different topics to be discussing?
I'm enjoying the contributions (and nice to bump into some friends as
fellow-lurkers!). It's nice to
panos, friends,
i like this idea, especially because it highlights what is valuable
about many of the exchanges that include the conviviality of arguing.
(once upon a time, in the later 1990s, there was a string of such
meetings... [incl. big arguments about joint projects like the READ ME
Fascinating to hear about personal engagement in Making, Graham!
I, too, have been personally, hands-on involved in Making since Access
Space's turn towards digital manufacture, and the interface of the
physical and the digital, since around 2010.
(For those of you who aren't aware of
I'd also like to add some thoughts here as a non-poster on Nettime.
I was recently contacted by some old friends, some of whom I haven't seen since
I was 16 years old. These friends were part of London's early squat party
scene. This scene was distinct from 'raves' heard so much about in the
16 matches
Mail list logo
