Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-07 Thread Dan Williams
On Fri, 2012-12-07 at 11:19 +0100, Dan Winship wrote: > On 12/06/2012 07:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > > Hi, > > > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite a > > while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support > > libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the n

Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-07 Thread Dan Winship
On 12/06/2012 07:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > Hi, > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite a > while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support > libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that are being added to > NM like bridging, bonding,

Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-06 Thread Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre
Go for it ;) Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre Freenode: cyphermox, Jabber: mathieu...@gmail.com 4096R/EE018C93 1967 8F7D 03A1 8F38 732E FF82 C126 33E1 EE01 8C93 On Thu, Dec 6, 2012 at 1:11 PM, Dan Williams wrote: > Hi, > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite a > whil

Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-06 Thread Michael Biebl
On 06.12.2012 19:11, Dan Williams wrote: > > So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for almost a year (2012-01-20), > and most major distros are packaging it (Ubuntu, OpenSUSE, Debian, > Fedora, Gentoo, Arch), would anyone object to libnl >= 3.2.7 as a build > requirement for the next release of

Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-06 Thread Robby Workman
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 14:29:26 -0600 Dan Williams wrote: > On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:57 -0600, Robby Workman wrote: > > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:49 -0600 > > Dan Williams wrote: > > > > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for > > > quite a while already, and it's becomin

Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-06 Thread Dan Williams
On Thu, 2012-12-06 at 13:57 -0600, Robby Workman wrote: > On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:49 -0600 > Dan Williams wrote: > > > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite > > a while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support > > libnl1.x and 2.x with some of

Re: Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-06 Thread Robby Workman
On Thu, 06 Dec 2012 12:11:49 -0600 Dan Williams wrote: > All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite > a while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support > libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that are being added > to NM like bridging, bond

Dropping support for libnl1 and libnl2?

2012-12-06 Thread Dan Williams
Hi, All the major distros appear to have been shipping libnl3.x for quite a while already, and it's becoming increasingly difficult to support libnl1.x and 2.x with some of the newer features that are being added to NM like bridging, bonding, vlan, etc. So, given that libnl 3.2.7 has been out for