On 28 Jul 2001, Ian Holsman wrote:
If you are interested, I could see if we could lend you a 8-way box
running Solaris 5.8, with a web-avalanche box to generate load sitting
next to it.
That would be lovely; as the OSDL folks are rather linux based - and that
is an understatment...
the
When adding keys; be aware that almost more useful (to humans at least)
than the actual key (which often is in key servers anyway) is the so
called fingerprint. This allows a human to verify the key against this
KEYS list, over the phone, etc. At some point I'd like to make this part
of a
We might want to wait for some of the conference-goers to get a
chance to get back to their mail clients (in case they have some
outstanding patches they'd like to get in *wink-wink*).
Working fine here too (freebsd and drawin). But still some small issues
with occasional coredump on
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 06:07:03PM -0400, Greg Ames wrote:
* an assert() trap, also in apr_sendfile, for the problem which is
responsible for the most core dumps on daedalus (APR_SUCCESS + 0 bytes
sent - wtf??), and
Could this be from
Folks,
Some time ago Sander Temme did some tests to certify Covalent's Apache/SSL
product as part of the SunTone program.
Part of that entails running it on anything from a tiny SUN Ultra T1 all
the way up to 8 way big iron.
We found that, for purely static content, the default locking
On Tue, 24 Jul 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Some folks in the Websphere performance team did some benchmarking on
machines from Sun all the way up to 8-ways. Victor was feeding them
Apache builds to play with. We tried the following accept locks:
fcntl, native Solaris, sysv, pthread. fcnlt
Any reason not to replicate apr its GCC specific '--enabling-profiling'
flag code into apr-util and httpd-2.0 ? Or is there already something
there ?
Dw
another 1.3 tree. I didn't commit to 2.0, because I forgot. :-( The
problem is that we are checking for the wrong errno when the setsockopt
fails. The errno we check for should never be returned by setsockopt. If
we change the errno to the correct one (I have to look at my patch),
Hmm
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This seems like an extremely complex way to implement this. The following
patch allows a binary compiled on FreeBSD with ACCEPTFILTERs to work on
FreeBSD's without them. My own preference is to remove the new directive,
because we will need to
I am getting more than a bit anoyed by the BSD accept filters; when you
have them in a binary; they are always on. And if the setsockopt()
fails things bomb wiht an exit(1).
Which is a bit of a pain if you move them between machines and/or have
kernels which (sometimes) do not have them plugged
Actually; I've just written this for an in-house experiment at covalent;
by just using function pointers. See attached hack to get an idea. It is
not ready for submittal - as it does not yet have sensible default choise.
Dw
On Fri, 22 Jun 2001, Jim Jagielski wrote:
I've been toying with the
On Thu, 24 May 2001, David Ziegler wrote:
I was just benchmarking my server, and I tried benchmarking with the ab
that comes with Apache 2.0 (.16). I get ridiculously slow numbers:
Note the 'warning:'
...
Total: 11 3148 3627.0533 10477
ERROR: The median and mean for the
Hit the send button too quickly - setting both run's to do the same number
of requests, say 4x1000 - might fix it; right now your ab-1 test is 10
times longer tham your ab-2 test.
Dw.
On Fri, 11 May 2001, Bill Stoddard wrote:
Hi all,
There has been some discussion on the proxy list about a patch that
allows request and response headers to be modified based on config
directives for proxy requests.
Ideally though, header fiddling should be done in mod_headers
This patch fixes all warnings on FreeBSD and MacOS-X as well as a
potential division by zero problem. What is the status of the tree ? Are
we in full freeze now ?
Dw
Index: ab.c
===
RCS file:
Can't we just back up to the prior level of ab? It was a big
distraction once the new function was committed to 2.0 to actually get
it to compile properly and stop dumping core. Obviously nobody has
had the time/inclination yet to do the same stuff with 1.3 ab.
Things are badly out of
This fixes all warnings and bugs I know of on FreeBSD/MacOSX. Still
checking on Solaris; whilst trying to find out if we are in a freeze -
slow going - am traveling myself (it is cold, and here is thunder,
lightning and rain in Chicago - and the network drops 20% of my packets).
I'd hate for
The RFC is very clear on this point; closing the connection is a perfectly
valid way to signal that they payload is done; and the Content-Length is
really rather optional.
I've worked around this problem in the past (but then from a gateway
-man-in-the-middle- perspective) because of stupid
On Sat, 5 May 2001, Ralf S. Engelschall wrote:
mod_tls and mod_ssl are unrelated. mod_tls was the first shot Ben did
for us. mod_ssl is the port of my Apache 1.3's mod_ssl to Apache 2.0.
Aye - shame -or- do I misunderstand - I was kind of looking at mod_tls -
and hoping it would be the
On Sun, 6 May 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
use piped logs. i.e. errorlog | tee /file1 /file2
(or maybe just use disk mirroring ;)
Whilst on the subject; We have the reverse problem in mod_log_config;
where you can open the same log file several times. Ideally we should
check if we already have
On Sat, 7 Apr 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
Um... let's not forget that you haven't posted the patch(es) to new-httpd
yet (i.e. most of us haven't seen them).
Do not forget that
http://klomp.covalent.net:8080/
has the patches (and actually run's on them too).
Dw.
On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, Greg Stein wrote:
It isn't a large goal. All you need to do is call request_rec "http
specific" and introduce "struct ap_request" for the common piece. IOW, don't
try to trim down request_rec (and ALL users), but introduce the new record.
We can then discuss what goes
Eeeek you are rihgt; I just tried it on FreeBSD. Hmm; wonder what the
maintener-mode does different on MacOS X.
Dw
On 3 Apr 2001, Jeff Trawick wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
dirkx 01/04/02 18:56:23
Modified:support ab.c
Log:
Make live simpler - as we are using
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Are you planning on ever building AB with SSL support without mod_tls? If
Yes.
not, then just leave the checks where they are. Your support config.m4
can still use them. If so, then move them to one of the ac*.m4 files, and
create macros out
On 2 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
trawick 01/04/02 14:59:04
Modified:support ab.c
Log:
consistent types; avoid warning on AIX for mismatch between printf
format and arg
What are your compiler flags ? I did not see this a moment ago on AIX and
would love to catch
What are your compiler flags ? I did not see this a moment ago on AIX and
would love to catch those ealier.
./configure --enable-maintainer-mode
Hmm - that means I'll have to check the compiler setup :-(
Dw
26 matches
Mail list logo
