Re: [[newbie] e-mails on our lists should be plain ols ASCII]

2000-03-11 Thread Denis Havlik
On 10 Mar 2000, Jaguar wrote: :~>Just out of curiosity...what is your stance on L O N G sig files...and also :~>the PGP encrypting (and subsequent display of the PGP coding) of list posts? :~>Are they really needed? :~>my .02 worth :~>Jaguar Mailing list should be plain ascii, and there is no ne

Re: [[newbie] e-mails on our lists should be plain ols ASCII]

2000-03-10 Thread Jaguar
Just out of curiosity...what is your stance on L O N G sig files...and also the PGP encrypting (and subsequent display of the PGP coding) of list posts? Are they really needed? my .02 worth Jaguar Denis Havlik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, folks > > I would appreciate it if all the postings

[newbie] e-mails on our lists should be plain ols ASCII

2000-03-09 Thread Denis Havlik
Hi, folks I would appreciate it if all the postings on our mailing lists would be plain old ASCII. I can see absolutely no need for html/word/attachements, and in particular no need for any executeable files in our mailing lists. I could enforce this, but I am not particularily keen on enforcing