Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]]

1999-09-30 Thread bay56
- Original Message - From: Steve Philp [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, September 29, 1999 4:50 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]] Let's get past all of the Windows-centric thinking that we've become accustomed

Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]]

1999-09-29 Thread Steve Philp
Ty Mixon wrote: Ok - then any idea why I got the original error? ldconfig didn't get run after installing new libs. -- Steve Philp "The Internet is like crack Network Administratorfor smart people..." Advance Packaging Corporation --Arsenio Hall

Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]]

1999-09-28 Thread Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
Well, for the most part. You can put in a Kernel update, then reconfigure LILO to enable you to access it without the install procedure, but you do of course have to restart the system to use the new Kernel. As for the software part, I guess that I am a creature of habit. So often in Win31 and

Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]]

1999-09-28 Thread Steve Philp
"Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." wrote: This entire thread started out from a message triggered by not running ldconfig after upgrading some libraries. To imagine that it degraded to this level of FUD and disinformation is absolutely amazing. Let's look at the statements made in just this reply (Sorry

Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]

1999-09-27 Thread Ernest N. Wilcox Jr.
I'm still too new at Linux to help with the repair job, but I can explain why you need to do the installer. When you are running an installed Linux system, the files you want to replace in a version upgrade are being used by the system, and cannot be replaced. That is why you need a boot disk, so

Re: [Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]]

1999-09-27 Thread Tymanthius Rune Speak
That mostly makes sense, but I kinda thought that one of the great things about Linux was the 'no need to reboot on upgrades' part. Guess not system upgrades, just end user software? Ty "Ernest N. Wilcox Jr." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'm still too new at Linux to help with the repair job, but

Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]

1999-09-27 Thread Steve Philp
I'm still too new at Linux to help with the repair job, but I can explain why you need to do the installer. When you are running an installed Linux system, the files you want to replace in a version upgrade are being used by the system, and cannot be replaced. That is Can't say I've ever seen

Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]

1999-09-26 Thread Tymanthius Rune Speak
Ok, but I don't understand why I can't just grab the rpms, and then upgrade what I have installed, using kpackage or rpm. Which is why I didn't read the readme or install files - didn't think I had to do an install. That's what I get for thunking . . . Anyhow I wrote down the error messages,

Re: [Re: [newbie] Upgradeing all packages destroys my system]

1999-09-26 Thread Bernhard Rosenkraenzer
On 26 Sep 1999, Tymanthius Rune Speak wrote: Ok, but I don't understand why I can't just grab the rpms, and then upgrade what I have installed, using kpackage or rpm. INIT: version 2.76 booting sh: error in loading shared libraries: libreadline.so.4.0: cannot open shared object file: no