Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-29 Thread Keith Powell
On Friday 28 Nov 2003 2:19 pm, Jerry Barton wrote: > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:15:57 + > > Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You will get that error if you are not using ../base for your > > contrib source. > > > > The /contrib/i586/ contains a synthesis.hdlist2.cz and > > the rpms

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Jerry Barton
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 15:15:57 + Charles A Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > You will get that error if you are not using ../base for your contrib > source. > > The /contrib/i586/ contains a synthesis.hdlist2.cz and the > rpms can be installed using such, But, it does not contain a list or

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Charles A Edwards
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 19:37:35 + Keith Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I too get the "Mirror uses invalid list try alternative method" > message when installing packages from contrib. I didn't mention it, > though, as I did not want to confuse things even more! You will get that error if yo

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Keith Powell
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 7:48 pm, Dick Gevers wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:18:48 +, Keith Powell > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: [newbie] Bad > signatures in > > 9.2: > >I installed the downloa

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-28 Thread Keith Powell
On Wednesday 26 Nov 2003 8:54 am, Jerry Barton wrote: > On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:18:48 + > > Keith Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I was wondering why the "Contrib" repository was giving the error > > messages with Mandrake9.2, when it didn't with earlier versions. > > Should I try to solve

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-26 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 26 Nov 2003 14:18:48 +, Keith Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2: >I installed the download edition of 9.2 from magazine cover disks, but >KPPP did not install. So I installed it from t

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-25 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 - -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tue, 25 Nov 2003 08:44:59 +, Keith Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2: >> >However, if I try to install anything from the rediris "con

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-25 Thread Keith Powell
On Sunday 23 Nov 2003 7:40 pm, Dick Gevers wrote: > On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:56:07 +, Keith Powell > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2: > >However, if I try to install anything from the rediris "contrib" > > mirror, I get th

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-23 Thread Dick Gevers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Sun, 23 Nov 2003 09:56:07 +, Keith Powell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote about [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2: >However, if I try to install anything from the rediris "contrib" mirror, >I get the "Invalid Signature&qu

Re: [newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-23 Thread Kaj Haulrich
On Sunday 23 November 2003 09:56, Keith Powell wrote: > However, if I try to install anything from the rediris "contrib" > mirror, I get the "Invalid Signature" message on each package. > But they will install if I ignore the message. I didn't get these > errors with 9.1 > > My query is, are the

[newbie] Bad signatures in 9.2

2003-11-23 Thread Keith Powell
Greetings all. For family reasons, I have been off the list (and rarely on the computer) for about ten weeks, and have just joined again. I wanted to try Mandrake9.2 so, before spending my hard-earned pension on the package, I have installed it from three magazine cover disks just to test. KP