On October 24, 2003 05:48 am, HaywireMac wrote:
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:17:30 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
We know that journalists are bought by advertising dollars and we know
which software model has the money to buy them. They are respected by
the public slightly
On October 23, 2003 03:28 am, HaywireMac wrote:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5094279.html
Ballmer also disputed the notion that open-source code is more secure
than Windows. The data doesn't jibe with that. In the first 150 days
after the release of Windows 2000, there were 17 critical
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:45 -0700
John Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Now..onto Linux. Whatever number of vulnerabilities are reported and
patched the fact remains that these are often discovered by the
development team and patched BEFORE any reported attempt to exploit
the
On Friday 24 October 2003 12:59 am, Michael Adams wrote:
snip
Trouble is Bryan, mainstream press quote these statements verbatim and
do not quote anything to the contrary alongside it. They are not
interested in doing any 'investigitive journalism' nowadays when they
can cut and paste from
On Fri, 24 Oct 2003 08:17:30 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
We know that journalists are bought by advertising dollars and we know
which software model has the money to buy them. They are respected by
the public slightly more than politicians and slightly less than
used-car
On Fri, 2003-10-24 at 01:46, HaywireMac wrote:
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 23:49:45 -0700
John Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Now..onto Linux. Whatever number of vulnerabilities are reported and
patched the fact remains that these are often discovered by the
development team and patched
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 06:28:03 -0400
HaywireMac [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5094279.html
Ballmer also disputed the notion that open-source code is more secure
than Windows. The data doesn't jibe with that. In the first 150 days
after the release of Windows
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5094279.html
Ballmer also disputed the notion that open-source code is more secure
than Windows. The data doesn't jibe with that. In the first 150 days
after the release of Windows 2000, there were 17 critical
vulnerabilities. For Windows Server 2003 there were
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 06:28, HaywireMac wrote:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5094279.html
Ballmer also disputed the notion that open-source code is more secure
than Windows. The data doesn't jibe with that. In the first 150 days
after the release of Windows 2000, there were 17 critical
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:16 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
snip
2) More security issues are reported with Linux at times both
because of the honesty of the working team and because the
working team is worldwide, with more eyeballs. Less bugs are
reported on M$ by M$ because they are liars.
On Thu, 2003-10-23 at 17:41, Kaj Haulrich wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 07:16 pm, Lyvim Xaphir wrote:
snip
2) More security issues are reported with Linux at times both
because of the honesty of the working team and because the
working team is worldwide, with more eyeballs. Less
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:26 pm, Anne Wilson graced me with:
On Thursday 23 Oct 2003 11:28 am, HaywireMac wrote:
http://zdnet.com.com/2100-1105_2-5094279.html
Ballmer also disputed the notion that open-source code is more
secure than Windows. The data doesn't jibe with that. In the
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:33 pm, Paul M. Bucalo wrote:
Balmer may be conveniently throwing in *all* of Red Hat's critical
vulnerabilities in its *distribution release*, which amounts to many,
many applications, not just the O/S. If he compares O/S to O/S,
instead of O/S to total
On Thu, 23 Oct 2003 17:45:56 -0400
Bryan Phinney [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thursday 23 October 2003 04:33 pm, Paul M. Bucalo wrote:
Balmer may be conveniently throwing in *all* of Red Hat's critical
vulnerabilities in its *distribution release*, which amounts to
many, many
14 matches
Mail list logo
