Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-08-02 Thread Randy Kramer
et wrote: > I would like to add, that buying from the "mandrake-store" online is a > greater benefit to MandrakeSoft, since the distributor in the USA gets his > cut, (McMillan). <.02$> BTW, I sure do hope McMillan begins to realize what a > gold mine Mandrake is for them and decides to step up to

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-08-01 Thread _nasturtium
- Original Message - From: "Miark" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Newbie at MDK" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2002 11:36 AM Subject: Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition. > No, not right. Absolutely nothing can come

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-08-01 Thread Charlie
July 31, 2002 06:45 pm, _nast-mdk81 wrote: > > Don't do that. > > > > That post to the list was inadvertant. I meant it as a private reply on > > 9.0 > > > > I was on this list and on the expert list with more than 1000 posts > > before I was ever a mandrakesoft employee, and I have no plans to

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-08-01 Thread et
Subject: Re: [newbie] > CivilEme petition. newbie-owner@linux-m > andrake.com > > > 07/31/2002 07:45 PM > Please respond to > _nasturtium > > On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 02:41

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread Dennis Myers
On Wednesday 31 July 2002 09:07 pm, you wrote: > > Did I miss it or has no-one thought to ask civilme what _he_ would > > like us to do? > > We did. He doesn't want us to do anything. > > Miark So that is what we should do, nothing. Civileme is in the position to know what is best for him. He ha

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread shane
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wednesday 31 July 2002 5:45 pm, _nast-mdk81 did speak unto the huddled masses, saying: > Interesting how the 40+ replies there have been have all misspelt his > name! bad speelers of the word untie! - -- warning: this sig file has been f

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread Marc
7/31/02 8:36:26 PM, Miark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Hello, >> Well, I'm sure 90% of us will sign a petition anyway :-)! As everyone else >> mentioned, you're a great asset to Mandrake and all it's users. And so we >> should help you back, right? > >No, not right. Absolutely nothing can come

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread Miark
> Did I miss it or has no-one thought to ask civilme what _he_ would > like us to do? We did. He doesn't want us to do anything. Miark Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread Paul Clyne
> > >> Hello, >> Well, I'm sure 90% of us will sign a petition anyway :-)! As everyone else >> mentioned, you're a great asset to Mandrake and all it's users. And so we >> should help you back, right? I have only ca

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread Miark
> Hello, > Well, I'm sure 90% of us will sign a petition anyway :-)! As everyone else > mentioned, you're a great asset to Mandrake and all it's users. And so we > should help you back, right? No, not right. Absolutely nothing can come of a petition, so crafting one would do nothing but pit us

Re: [newbie] CivilEme petition.

2002-07-31 Thread _nast-mdk81
On Wed, 31 Jul 2002 02:41, civileme wrote: > frankie wrote: > >anyone fancy starting a "Save Civilme" petition > Don't do that. > > That post to the list was inadvertant. I meant it as a private reply on > 9.0 > > I was on this list and on the expert list with more than 1000 posts > before I