apr
From: Ammon Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:43:13 -0700
The trouble is that I did install Windows first, Linux second allowing
LILO to write over the boot s
This is because you are not booting from the disk. You must boot from the
Dos disk and then do a fdisk /mbr.
Moose
-Original Message-
From: Ammon Cooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
How
:
This is because you are not booting from the disk. You must boot from the
Dos disk and then do a fdisk /mbr.
Moose
-Original Message-
From: Ammon Cooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 1:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
I dont think you want to do it this way. I believe win2k and win98 use
diffeerent mbr records. If you replace you win2k boot parition with a
win98 one, I dont think it will be very happy
to make winnt startup disk go to the hell and search for startup disk
however
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 2:20 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
I dont think you want to do it this way. I believe win2k and win98 use
diffeerent mbr records. If you replace you win2k boot parition with a
win98 one, I
my system is set up and it works fine
(however I am
using GRUB).
apr
From: Ammon Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:43:13 -0700
The trouble is that I did i
It is a common misconception... Don't worry.
-Original Message-
From: Nadin Merali [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2001 3:07 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
SHIT
I wish i knew before
oh well
On Thu, 29 Mar 2001, Kelly
PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
I dont think you want to do it this way. I believe win2k and win98 use
diffeerent mbr records. If you replace you win2k boot parition with a
win98 one, I dont think it will be very happy
to make winnt startup disk go to the hell and search
:20 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
I dont think you want to do it this way. I believe win2k and win98 use
diffeerent mbr records. If you replace you win2k boot parition with a
win98 one, I dont think it will be very happy
to make winnt startup disk go
using
GRUB).
apr
From: Ammon Cooke [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:43:13 -0700
The trouble is that I did install Windows first, Linux second allowing
LILO to write over the boot sector
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:43:13 -0700
The trouble is that I did install Windows first, Linux second allowing
LILO to write over the boot sector on the windows drive. But the funny
thing about
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
Date: Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:43:13 -0700
The trouble is that I did install Windows first, Linux second allowing
LILO to write over the boot sector on the windows drive. But the funny
thing about the problem is that not even a Windows 2000 Pro
I have 2 hard drives, the first containing a Win 2K Pro installation, the
second a Linux Mandrake 7.2. When I installed I put LILO on the
first(windows hard drive), it supposedly would allow me to boot either
Windows or Linux, but for some reason when I try to boot Windows the screen
just
Make sure you install Mandrake second Windows will force itself to be the
only bootable partition otherwise
-Original Message-
From: Ammon Cooke [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 6:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [newbie] Dual Boot Trouble
I have 2 hard
14 matches
Mail list logo
