Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-29 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 11:34, Miark wrote: > On 29 Jul 2003 01:20:06 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > A "virtual" certainty. It's one of the reasons why they did not want > > little puppet judge Kotar-Kelly to get ahold of the source code. In > > addition to that you would als

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-29 Thread Robin Turner
Paul wrote: After IBM took possesion of MS-DOS they had to sort out over 300 bugs in 4,000 lines of code changed name tp PC-DOS (that's why it's licensed to MS & IBM). Ye gods, that's not far from one line in ten! Even my programming isn't that bad! Sir Robin -- "There are other rules, but you'

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-29 Thread James Henry Maiewski
Hello, Now that we have the record industry suing the parents of those who download copyrighted songs, I shiver to think what the lawers at Micro$oft might come up with. Jim On Tuesday 29 July 2003 11:34 am, Miark wrote: > On 29 Jul 2003 01:20:06 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-29 Thread Paul
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 17:26, Bob Read wrote: > Miark wrote: > (SNIP) > > Speaking of which, what's the likelihood that M$ is using GPLed code in > > their crap? > > 100% > > Bob > Original MS-DOS was based on Q-DOS which gates boutght for USD 50,000 after being approached by IBM who had been tu

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-29 Thread Miark
On 29 Jul 2003 01:20:06 -0400, Lyvim Xaphir <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > A "virtual" certainty. It's one of the reasons why they did not want > little puppet judge Kotar-Kelly to get ahold of the source code. In > addition to that you would also be able to prove the existence of > engineered sec

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-29 Thread Bob Read
Miark wrote: (SNIP) Speaking of which, what's the likelihood that M$ is using GPLed code in their crap? 100% Bob Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft? Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-28 Thread Aron Smith
On Monday 28 July 2003 09:55 pm, Miark wrote: > On 26 Jul 2003 22:06:14 +0300, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > There was also the disk-compression software,Stacker. > > > > Ms offered to allow the developer/company to add it to MS-DOS 6 without > > paying them royalties. For some reason they re

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 00:59, Miark wrote: > Central Point... that rings a bell from my Apple IIc days. Any connection? > > Miark > Central Point was the creator of PC Tools...mainly a Dos-win31X thing. It's noteworthy that Xtree lives on these days in the Linux world. http://www.xtreefanpage.o

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-28 Thread Lyvim Xaphir
On Tue, 2003-07-29 at 00:55, Miark wrote: > On 26 Jul 2003 22:06:14 +0300, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > There was also the disk-compression software,Stacker. > > > > Ms offered to allow the developer/company to add it to MS-DOS 6 without > > paying them royalties. For some reason they r

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-28 Thread Miark
On 26 Jul 2003 22:06:14 +0300, Paul <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > There was also the disk-compression software,Stacker. > > Ms offered to allow the developer/company to add it to MS-DOS 6 without > paying them royalties. For some reason they refused, Ms put in > double-space - & got sued. had to

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-28 Thread Miark
Central Point... that rings a bell from my Apple IIc days. Any connection? Miark > On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 19:12, John Wilson wrote: > > > > XTree was one product I was thinking of, though if memory serves (which it > > sometimes doesn't) that was the DOS product not the Windoze one. It was >

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-26 Thread Paul
On Sat, 2003-07-26 at 19:12, John Wilson wrote: > On July 26, 2003 03:42 am, _nasturtium wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > > > Would that product be XTree? > > > > Anyway, > > http://www.symantec.com/corporate/ > > "Historical Highlights" > > June 1994 Central Point Software Acquisition

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-26 Thread John Wilson
On July 26, 2003 03:42 am, _nasturtium wrote: > > Hello, > > Would that product be XTree? > > Anyway, > http://www.symantec.com/corporate/ > "Historical Highlights" > June 1994 Central Point Software Acquisition > > I think Symantec owns Central Point Software ... unl

Re: [newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-26 Thread _nasturtium
On Sat, 26 Jul 2003 04:20 pm, John Wilson wrote: > PS -- Anyone remember a little company called Central Point Software who > made a better Winsucks Explorer than M$? And a better on-the-fly > compression system? They sued M$, damned near went broke in the process, > won and then M$ bought them o

[newbie] MS in trouble, sorry it's kinda OT

2003-07-25 Thread crak600
http://www.fortune.com/fortune/technology/articles/0,15114,466180,00.html i don't think this has been posted yet, and i think it's definetly worth a read. i came across this last night and just laughed. it's pretty funny that the company that's working to stop piracy of their operating systems