I stand corrected. I knew everyone would set me straight :-)
Thanks to all who set me back on the path of righteousness! ;-)
Terry
Greg Meyer wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 02:50 pm, Terry Sheltra wrote:
If I recall correctly, you need to
On Tuesday February 25 2003 06:43 pm, Seedkum Aladeem wrote:
Pretty soon all the PCs and laptops will need to have more than 1GB
of RAM. What is happening here is probably an early signal for the
kernel developers to revamp memory management.
Seedkum
The linux-kernel people are
On Wednesday February 26 2003 11:23 am, Seedkum Aladeem wrote:
While there's already 64 bit production machines, that use
gigs of ram, there's also already Linux performance optimized
kernels for them. IIRC, the kernels were ready before the
systems were. OTOH, before you'll see 64
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 01:31 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Wednesday February 26 2003 11:23 am, Seedkum Aladeem wrote:
While there's already 64 bit production machines, that use
gigs of ram, there's also already Linux performance optimized
kernels for them. IIRC, the kernels
Fred Schroeder wrote:
Thanks for all of the replys, guess I will try to roll my own, sure hope I
don't screw this up!!
you will seldom screw up if you always back up before
you install or modify anything that is working.
'things' will screw up enough on their own.
peace out.
tc,hago.
g
.
--
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 03:33 pm, civileme wrote:
On Wednesday 26 February 2003 01:31 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Wednesday February 26 2003 11:23 am, Seedkum Aladeem wrote:
While there's already 64 bit production machines, that use
gigs of ram, there's also already Linux
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 02:50 pm, Terry Sheltra wrote:
If I recall correctly, you need to purchase the server version of
Mandrake. That version will allow memory to be used higher than 1 GB.
Of course, if I'm wrong, I'm sure someone will be
In reply to Anne's mail, d.d. Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:19:29 +:
On Tuesday 25 Feb 2003 7:50 pm, Paul wrote:
* When booting, Linux does not see all physically installed memory:
e.g. you have 196 megs of RAM and linux only 'sees' 64Megs. As root, you
need to edit /etc/lilo.conf. Add the line
On Tuesday 25 Feb 2003 9:11 pm, Paul wrote:
In reply to Anne's mail, d.d. Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:19:29 +:
On Tuesday 25 Feb 2003 7:50 pm, Paul wrote:
* When booting, Linux does not see all physically installed memory:
e.g. you have 196 megs of RAM and linux only 'sees' 64Megs. As root, you
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:50, Paul wrote:
In reply to Fred's mail, d.d. Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:44:17 -0600:
Hi,
I have a Mandrake 9.0 system, in the machine I have put three 512Meg
chips, so it should have 1,536Meg of Ram. But in the system monitor,
it only shows 884Meg. What is up? When the
On Tuesday February 25 2003 01:44 pm, Fred Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
I have a Mandrake 9.0 system, in the machine I have put three
512Meg chips, so it should have 1,536Meg of Ram. But in the system
monitor, it only shows 884Meg. What is up? When the machine
boots, it says it has 1572864 memory,
] Memory limit?
On Tuesday February 25 2003 01:44 pm, Fred Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
I have a Mandrake 9.0 system, in the machine I have put three
512Meg chips, so it should have 1,536Meg of Ram. But in the system
monitor, it only shows 884Meg. What is up? When the machine
boots, it says
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 10:44 am, Fred Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
I have a Mandrake 9.0 system, in the machine I have put three 512Meg chips,
so it should have 1,536Meg of Ram. But in the system monitor, it only
shows 884Meg. What is up? When the machine boots, it says it has 1572864
memory,
On Tuesday 25 February 2003 02:07 pm, Tom Brinkman wrote:
On Tuesday February 25 2003 01:44 pm, Fred Schroeder wrote:
Hi,
I have a Mandrake 9.0 system, in the machine I have put three
512Meg chips, so it should have 1,536Meg of Ram. But in the system
monitor, it only shows 884Meg. What
14 matches
Mail list logo
