On Wednesday 18 June 2003 03:02, Brant Fitzsimmons wrote:
Damian Gatabria wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 01:33, eric huff wrote:
So, in the end, it did have something to do with networking...
-A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1 -p tcp -j ACCEPT
Sorry if i missed it: where does this go?
Damian Gatabria wrote:
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 01:33, eric huff wrote:
So, in the end, it did have something to do with networking...
-A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1 -p tcp -j ACCEPT
Sorry if i missed it: where does this go?
That's an iptables
At 09:21 AM 6/15/03, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
Time to load OpenOffice from point of click to actual start of program.
It loads all it's necessary libraries at that time, unlike MS Office
that has DLL's loaded at the actual system bootup for Windows (whatever
version); that's how MS Office appears to
On Tuesday 17 June 2003 01:33, eric huff wrote:
So, in the end, it did have something to do with networking...
-A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1 -p tcp -j ACCEPT
Sorry if i missed it: where does this go?
That's an iptables rule (a firewall rule). It goes in whatever file
you use to save
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 23:13:21 -0400
JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
But Blackbox?! Not even nice pixmaps to play with? Bah!
==
I just make my own. Talk about customization |8^)
Best,
Mike
--
The man who views the world the same at 50 as he
Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:08, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:02:44 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
how can I preload it ?
I have mandrake 9.1 and I am using OO very often...
thanks in advance
Sorry, I don't go within 6 miles of Gnome or KDE. But if you check on
It's worth having if you're using 1.0 and have the spare RAM.
1.1 Beta seems to be quicker. From the command line
soffice
on its own opens the program without a document (this may change back to
the 1.0 default of opening with a blank document). It takes 12 seconds
on my home machine
So, in the end, it did have something to do with networking...
-A INPUT -s 127.0.0.1 -d 127.0.0.1 -p tcp -j ACCEPT
Sorry if i missed it: where does this go?
Want to buy your Pack or Services from MandrakeSoft?
Go to http://www.mandrakestore.com
I have PIII 933 Mhz 650MB , it takes about 22 sec.
Mandrake 9.1 , OO 1.0.2
I think is very slow... anyone cas post a better time?
I
15 2003 07:33, / Greg Meyer :
On Sunday 15 June 2003 12:10 am, Damian Gatabria wrote:
In the last few weeks i've noticed OO taking over 6 minutes
to start.
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 09:32, manolis wrote:
I have PIII 933 Mhz 650MB , it takes about 22 sec.
Mandrake 9.1 , OO 1.0.2
I think is very slow... anyone cas post a better time?
Interesting: Athlon 1200, 256Mb RAM and it takes exactly 22 seconds
also. Also MDK 9.1 and OO 1.0.2.
Paul
--
Modern
22sec for the first time to load.
-if you close it and the load it again about 12 sec.
-if you leave it open and open another file about 5-6 sec.
15 2003 10:49, / Paul :
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 09:32, manolis wrote:
I have PIII 933 Mhz 650MB , it takes about 22 sec.
Mandrake 9.1 , OO
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:20:57 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
22sec for the first time to load.
-if you close it and the load it again about 12 sec.
-if you leave it open and open another file about 5-6 sec.
19 seconds for initial launch on
Strange results for the initial launch
Why it take so time to load?
15 2003 14:08, / Michael Scottaline :
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 13:20:57 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
22sec for the first time to load.
-if you close it and the load it again about 12 sec.
-if you
On Sunday 15 Jun 2003 12:48 pm, manolis wrote:
Strange results for the initial launch
Why it take so time to load?
Because it has as much to load as microsoft office, but instead of
part-loading at boot, as M$O does, it loads at first use. After that
it doesn't need to load the whole
On 15 Jun 2003, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 00:14, Wm. G. Urquhart wrote:
On 15 Jun 2003, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 17:49, Paul wrote:
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 09:32, manolis wrote:
I have PIII 933 Mhz 650MB , it takes about 22 sec.
Mandrake 9.1 ,
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 02:32, manolis wrote:
I have PIII 933 Mhz 650MB , it takes about 22 sec.
Mandrake 9.1 , OO 1.0.2
I think is very slow... anyone cas post a better time?
Not to start a my computer is better than your computer war, but,
Dell Latitude C640 P4 (on battery @ 1.2GHz) 512Mb -
Time to load OpenOffice from point of click to actual start of program.
It loads all it's necessary libraries at that time, unlike MS Office
that has DLL's loaded at the actual system bootup for Windows (whatever
version); that's how MS Office appears to load so fast - it's because
most of
On 15 Jun 2003 04:46:04 -0500
Chuck Stuettgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Dell Latitude C640 P4 (on battery @ 1.2GHz) 512Mb - Mandrake 9.0 -
Open Office 1.0.1 Starts in 4 seconds.
Holy sweet Jesus...what desktop are you using tho, in Gnome I believe it
preloads OO at startup, therefore a
how can I preload it ?
I have mandrake 9.1 and I am using OO very often...
thanks in advance
15 2003 18:42, / JoeHill :
On 15 Jun 2003 04:46:04 -0500
Chuck Stuettgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Dell Latitude C640 P4 (on battery @ 1.2GHz) 512Mb - Mandrake 9.0 -
Open Office 1.0.1 Starts in
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:02:44 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
how can I preload it ?
I have mandrake 9.1 and I am using OO very often...
thanks in advance
Sorry, I don't go within 6 miles of Gnome or KDE. But if you check on
the OO site, there is an FAQ which I *believe* explains
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:02:44 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
how can I preload it ?
I have mandrake 9.1 and I am using OO very often...
thanks in advance
Sorry, I don't go within 6 miles of Gnome or KDE. But if you check on
the OO site,
On Sun, 2003-06-15 at 10:42, JoeHill wrote:
On 15 Jun 2003 04:46:04 -0500
Chuck Stuettgen [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Dell Latitude C640 P4 (on battery @ 1.2GHz) 512Mb - Mandrake 9.0 -
Open Office 1.0.1 Starts in 4 seconds.
Holy sweet Jesus...what desktop are you using tho, in Gnome I
On Sunday 15 June 2003 11:15 am, manolis wrote:
Time to load OpenOffice from point of click to actual start of program.
It loads all it's necessary libraries at that time, unlike MS Office
that has DLL's loaded at the actual system bootup for Windows (whatever
version); that's how MS
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:29:21 + (UTC)
Wm. G. Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
OT But what GUI do you use if you don't use KDE or Gnome since you're
using a GUI mail client?
Pekwm! The best! Beats Fluxbox, Blackbox, beats em all by a country
mile! Faaast!
You can see some
On Sunday 15 June 2003 01:33, Greg Meyer wrote:
On Sunday 15 June 2003 12:10 am, Damian Gatabria wrote:
In the last few weeks i've noticed OO taking over 6 minutes
to start. This machine is a Pentium 2, 400 mhz. OO would
take about 50 seconds to start, which was bearable, but
now, no
It's only cheating if you are doing a comparison and don't tell that you
are doing this, which is what MS likes to do.
LOL
good point!
by the way where I can find the quickstarter you mentioned?
___
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Enter the fields of battle at ...
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 12:48:09 -0400
JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:29:21 + (UTC)
Wm. G. Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
OT But what GUI do you use if you don't use KDE or Gnome since you're
using a GUI mail client?
Pekwm! The best! Beats Fluxbox,
On Sunday 15 Jun 2003 4:15 pm, manolis wrote:
My opinion is that I don't think this is cheating, it's a good idea
to pre-launch many usable parts of libraries in boot time in
windows. I don't close the system many times, so as many things are
in the memory cache as better it is
But you
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 16:05:19 -0400
Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
But I don't think it
beats ratpoison by a country mile in terms of speed. Not certain it
beats it at all, in that department. Ratpoison has a smaller foot
print, BTW. To each. ;o)
Well, ok, Ratpoison or
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 01:13, Wm. G. Urquhart wrote:
Hi Thanks for the quick reply.
I've just tested my OpenOffice (Using Write) and it load in 14 seconds
this is on a Dual Processor 200Mhz (yes! 200Mhz) running 9.1 with 1Gb RAM
a 56Gb SCSI RAIDed disk subsystem, and a TNT2 M64 32MB Video.
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:08, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:02:44 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
how can I preload it ?
I have mandrake 9.1 and I am using OO very often...
thanks in advance
Sorry, I don't go within 6 miles of Gnome or KDE. But if you check on
the OO
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:48, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:29:21 + (UTC)
Wm. G. Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
OT But what GUI do you use if you don't use KDE or Gnome since you're
using a GUI mail client?
Pekwm! The best! Beats Fluxbox, Blackbox, beats em all by a
On Sunday 15 June 2003 18:28, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:08, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 19:02:44 +0300
manolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
how can I preload it ?
I have mandrake 9.1 and I am using OO very often...
thanks in advance
Sorry, I don't go
On 16 Jun 2003 09:43:18 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Picky picky picky.
I shouldn't say really, I have yet to try XFCE4. I'm just not a big fan
of icons and taskbars.
--
Joehill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage: http://nodex.sytes.net
20:55:47 up 21:35, 1 user,
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:56:33 -0400
JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 16 Jun 2003 09:43:18 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Picky picky picky.
I shouldn't say really, I have yet to try XFCE4. I'm just not a big
fan of icons and taskbars.
I like a taskbar but I do not
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 16:13:16 -0400
JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 16:05:19 -0400
Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
But I don't think it
beats ratpoison by a country mile in terms of speed. Not certain it
beats it at all, in that department.
On 16 Jun 2003 07:46:43 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 02:48, JoeHill wrote:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 17:29:21 + (UTC)
Wm. G. Urquhart [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
OT But what GUI do you use if you don't use KDE or Gnome since you're
using a
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 20:56:33 -0400
JoeHill [EMAIL PROTECTED] insightfully noted:
On 16 Jun 2003 09:43:18 +1000
Stephen Kuhn [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Picky picky picky.
I shouldn't say really, I have yet to try XFCE4. I'm just not a big fan
of icons and taskbars.
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:06:28 -0400
Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
`course, we could all just use emacs as our OS/wm and be done with it,
no? ;)
Time for a Homer quote:
Donuts...is there *anything* they can't do...?
--
Joehill
Registered Linux user #282046
Homepage:
On Sun, 15 Jun 2003 22:04:25 -0400
Michael Scottaline [EMAIL PROTECTED] uttered:
Don't ya just LOVE having *choice*! Long Live Linux!!
That is why I fall in love every day that I use it.
I remember a quote from long ago (man is this thread hijacked):
When using Windows, 30 minutes feels
On Sunday 15 June 2003 05:20 pm, Stephen Kuhn wrote:
On Mon, 2003-06-16 at 01:13, Wm. G. Urquhart wrote:
Hi Thanks for the quick reply.
I've just tested my OpenOffice (Using Write) and it load in 14 seconds
this is on a Dual Processor 200Mhz (yes! 200Mhz) running 9.1 with 1Gb RAM
a 56Gb
In the last few weeks i've noticed OO taking over 6 minutes
to start. This machine is a Pentium 2, 400 mhz. OO would
take about 50 seconds to start, which was bearable, but
now, no matter what i do to it, it just stalls for about 5 minutes.
Once i have one instance sunning, opening
On Sunday 15 June 2003 12:10 am, Damian Gatabria wrote:
In the last few weeks i've noticed OO taking over 6 minutes
to start. This machine is a Pentium 2, 400 mhz. OO would
take about 50 seconds to start, which was bearable, but
now, no matter what i do to it, it just stalls for about 5
43 matches
Mail list logo
