Joseph Red wrote:
>
> Hmm, good question about rw. R *should* work. Try it:) As for the
> security/permissions, I was told the "right" way would be to create a group
> for the cam, add myself to the group, and give the *group* rights to ttyS0.
>
> Joseph Red
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Seems like th
"Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, December 28, 2000 8:27 PM
Subject: Re: [newbie] One more question about digital cameras...
> Joseph Red wrote:
> >
> > The way I fixed it, which isn't the "proper"
Joseph Red wrote:
>
> The way I fixed it, which isn't the "proper" or security-minded way, was to
> give everyone rw access to ttyS0. I just su'd & chmod. & my next
> suggestion was going to be to try the other port :)
>
> Joseph Red
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Joseph. Well, sometimes us 'Nix user
Ronald J. Hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Mandrake Newbie Mailing List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 27, 2000 11:12 PM
Subject: [newbie] One more question about digital cameras...
> I do have another question concerning Gphoto and digital camera use
I do have another question concerning Gphoto and digital camera use. I was only
able to get it to work as "su" because my normal user returned a permission
error on ttyxxx...
I understand that normally, though kppp, my user can access ttyS00 because its
really linked to /dev/modem, which has all
