Honestly Mike... I think it started out that way. You'd have to find a
serious Slacker to confirm that though. I think most people still
install it via FTP, but basically the install is a FreeBSD install. It
installs everything from source, I think it may use RPMs, but as I said,
I didn't have
On Tue, 7 Aug 2001 23:18:41 -0400
Tim Holmes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> insightfully noted:
TH> This really comes down to what do they want to do with the machines.
TH> Are these going to be desktops for users? Are these going to be
TH> servers? Are these going to be used to teach a class on Linux?
T
This really comes down to what do they want to do with the machines.
Are these going to be desktops for users? Are these going to be
servers? Are these going to be used to teach a class on Linux?
I've installed quite a good number of different distros in "my day."
(Always wanted to say that! :0
Title: RE: [newbie] Reasons for use LM 8.0
I have messed around with Caldera, Redhat and LM over the passed 2 1/2 years and IMHO, Linux-Mandrake is the most user friendly and has the exceptional list of applications in the "Power Pack" (don't know what comes with the enterprise
At 11:23 AM 08/07/2001 -0300, Nicolás Gómez wrote:
>Hi...In my college we are going to install in about 20 PC's one Linux
>distribution. I believe that LM 8.0 is the best one i ever seen so far
>for the purposes we had... Another persons think that SuSE 7.1 is the best,
>another ones think tha
Here is as unbiased as I can muster, a description of distributions
talents.
Mandrake - Easy installation and setup, lots of apps, multimedia, ease of app
installation
RedHat - Fairly easy installation and setup, some neat apps, multimedia,
pretty secure, ease of app installation, easy
